by camerado » Sat Jul 06, 2019 6:15 pm
Actually, the childrens' parents needed to sign the release, and the release needs to include a 'sensitive use' clause in it for the model depicting the underage sex worker minor.
A sensitive use clause would allow a model's photo to be used in a campaign which could otherwise negatively impact that person. (the model).
There was quite a big case about this sensitive use topic a few years ago when a model signed a legit release, without a sensitive use clause, only to find her likeness and image used in an HIV / AIDS awareness campaign. The model objected, as the pairing of her likeness with the topic of HIV / AIDS created the impresson among the general public (including her family and friends), that she herself - the model - had HIV / AIDS and was being depicted in a documentary fashion.
Aside from the technicalities, the ad is unnecessarily over the top and comes off as somewhat sensational, insensitive, and exploitive.
Actually, the childrens' parents needed to sign the release, and the release needs to include a 'sensitive use' clause in it for the model depicting the underage sex worker minor.
A sensitive use clause would allow a model's photo to be used in a campaign which could otherwise negatively impact that person. (the model).
There was quite a big case about this sensitive use topic a few years ago when a model signed a legit release, without a sensitive use clause, only to find her likeness and image used in an HIV / AIDS awareness campaign. The model objected, as the pairing of her likeness with the topic of HIV / AIDS created the impresson among the general public (including her family and friends), that she herself - the model - had HIV / AIDS and was being depicted in a documentary fashion.
Aside from the technicalities, the ad is unnecessarily over the top and comes off as somewhat sensational, insensitive, and exploitive.