1) Correct, I did not mean every single school in Cambodiaspringrain wrote:I'm not 'intelligent' enough to use the quote function well, but you, too, are making a series of daft (if I might say so) assumptions, thus:GMJS-440 wrote:To answer the OP, I believe that Cambodia schools are willing to accept bottomfeeders while Vietnam actually requires the teachers to be capable of performing their role. I would imagine that the schools in vietnam are much less likely to accept crack fiends relative to Cambodia.
The teachers I know in Vietnam are generally much more intelligent than the ones I know in Cambodia.
1) You call blanket coverage of 'Cambodian Schools'. Are they all the same? Do you know that?
2) You dare to call all (as opposed to some, which I would like you to define) teachers as 'bottomfeeders'. Which Schools? Which teachers? You also posit that 'Vietnam' schools (you imagine) are much less likely to accept ... and so on ...
3) Do you have any proof to back up your absurd accusations? Other than the 'teachers I know in Vietnam,' I mean. Names? And, GMJS, how do you define 'intelligent'?
2) I said all are bottomfeeders? Where?
3) Proof? I do believe I am permitted to post my educated opinion without attaching supporting documentation or naming people. Can you name some that prove otherwise?