ANALYSIS OF U.S. MILITARY ASSISTANCE
TO CAMBODIA, 1970-1975
https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a133443.pdf
Sorry to drop a 5,000 pounder onto you. This is one weighty doc.
Although only a Masters thesis it is the best detail and description of the whole USMAP effort that I have come across.
Also good for; plotting the war on the ground, FUNK, the politics that influenced the practical US military efforts, day to day conduct and style of the fighting, US/FUNK tactics versus KC, etc etc etc.
If you wikipedia the author, you will see he is the the ultimate US military insider - so it is pretty safe to assume his mindset as being quite representative of official US military thinking during the Cambodian war. (his actual service in Cambodia is further detailed on pg 6 of the doc)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Bowra
A good one for the archive.
Inside US military, Cambodia 1970-75
- Hairy-nosed Otter
- Expat in exile
- Reactions: 5
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2019 5:04 am
Inside US military, Cambodia 1970-75
...then he smiled again, and slipped away, further on up the stream
- Hairy-nosed Otter
- Expat in exile
- Reactions: 5
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2019 5:04 am
Well that little bomb sure did its job. Or perhaps everybody is busily buried in their bunkers, still studying away.
Anyway, my 30 day, one and only experiment in social media is completed. Sincere thanks to everybody - it was very........ "interesting".
Best..... H-n.
Anyway, my 30 day, one and only experiment in social media is completed. Sincere thanks to everybody - it was very........ "interesting".
Best..... H-n.
...then he smiled again, and slipped away, further on up the stream
NoHairy-nosed Otter wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:13 amWell that little bomb sure did its job. Or perhaps everybody is busily buried in their bunkers, still studying away.
Anyway, my 30 day, one and only experiment in social media is completed. Sincere thanks to everybody - it was very........ "interesting".
Best..... H-n.
Otter please stay. I like you're refreshing posts mate.
-
- 5 minutes to kill
- Reactions: 1
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2022 11:43 am
The thesis provided in the link should be treated with extreme caution I'd say. Written by a miliatry man, assessed by military men using military sources. Hmmm. Objectivity - zero. Critical thinking - zero. Worldview - extremely limited.
Anyone quoting Kissinger and Nixon on the history of Cambodia or any other state in Southeast Asia without offering contrary views or any other analysis is already on a slippery slope. Kissinger is bascially a war criminal and if he'd ever wound up at the ICC that's what they'd have said. Many of the references for the thesis are just other US military sources, doubtless trotting out the same military-speak with authors limited to Reader's Digest mentality and heavily US-centric worldviews.
In his introduction to Chapter One he makes some unsubstantiated claims; ‘In 1970, the political leadership of Cambodia under Prince Norodom Sihanouk clearly supported the Communist movement in Southeast Asia. Actually, Sihanouk had been virulently anti-communist, at least in Cambodia, which is how come all the “Khmers Rouges” (his terms and yes, all the “s’s”) wound up in the countryside as his secret police hunted them down.
And then this; ‘Public opinion in Cambodia soon turned against Sihanouk for his pro-Commiunist [sic] policy.’ Did they?
Interesting that one of the few non-military sources he quotes early on is by François Bizot (claim to fame is as the only Westerner to have survived captivity by the Khmer Rouge) who had nothing good to say about the West in Cambodia or Southeaast Asia especially the Americans as he despised their uncouth methods, ‘crass ignorance of the milieu in which they had intervened, their clumsy demagogy, their misplaced clear conscience, and that easy-going, childlike sincerity that bordered on stupidity. They were total strangers in the areas, driven by clichés about Asia worthy of the flimsiest tourist guides, and they behaved accordingly.’
One of the most cutting descriptions of the US in Southeast Asia, and probably accurate of their foreign policy elsewhere, is by an American himself, Stanley Karnow, who said of a leading US advisor in Southeast Asia at that time that he; ‘exuded a brand of artless goodwill that overlooked the deeper dynamics of revolutionary upheavals, and he seemed oblivious to the social and cultural complexities of Asia.’ The guy who wrote this thesis would fit into that category.
Goodness me.
Anyone quoting Kissinger and Nixon on the history of Cambodia or any other state in Southeast Asia without offering contrary views or any other analysis is already on a slippery slope. Kissinger is bascially a war criminal and if he'd ever wound up at the ICC that's what they'd have said. Many of the references for the thesis are just other US military sources, doubtless trotting out the same military-speak with authors limited to Reader's Digest mentality and heavily US-centric worldviews.
In his introduction to Chapter One he makes some unsubstantiated claims; ‘In 1970, the political leadership of Cambodia under Prince Norodom Sihanouk clearly supported the Communist movement in Southeast Asia. Actually, Sihanouk had been virulently anti-communist, at least in Cambodia, which is how come all the “Khmers Rouges” (his terms and yes, all the “s’s”) wound up in the countryside as his secret police hunted them down.
And then this; ‘Public opinion in Cambodia soon turned against Sihanouk for his pro-Commiunist [sic] policy.’ Did they?
Interesting that one of the few non-military sources he quotes early on is by François Bizot (claim to fame is as the only Westerner to have survived captivity by the Khmer Rouge) who had nothing good to say about the West in Cambodia or Southeaast Asia especially the Americans as he despised their uncouth methods, ‘crass ignorance of the milieu in which they had intervened, their clumsy demagogy, their misplaced clear conscience, and that easy-going, childlike sincerity that bordered on stupidity. They were total strangers in the areas, driven by clichés about Asia worthy of the flimsiest tourist guides, and they behaved accordingly.’
One of the most cutting descriptions of the US in Southeast Asia, and probably accurate of their foreign policy elsewhere, is by an American himself, Stanley Karnow, who said of a leading US advisor in Southeast Asia at that time that he; ‘exuded a brand of artless goodwill that overlooked the deeper dynamics of revolutionary upheavals, and he seemed oblivious to the social and cultural complexities of Asia.’ The guy who wrote this thesis would fit into that category.
Goodness me.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
GDP per capita animation for Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Vietnam 1970-2019
by Lucky Lucan » Tue Jan 26, 2021 12:43 am » in Cambodia Speakeasy - 2 Replies
- 1098 Views
-
Last post by Cam-pooh-cheer
Wed Jan 27, 2021 3:08 am
-
-
- 7 Replies
- 2700 Views
-
Last post by horace
Sun May 17, 2020 9:34 pm
-
- 12 Replies
- 3348 Views
-
Last post by Lucky Lucan
Wed May 20, 2020 5:36 pm