Are Prostitutes Better Than Normal Women?
A quick google search shows that this exact same rant is being posted all over the internet by some random troll. Don't expect the OP to come back and engage in a discussion. He is bombarding dozens of forums.
Thank you for acknowledging the fact there are different paths.Jacked Camry wrote:Certainly one can choose any path they want, and there's nothing wrong with that. Furthermore, I've no personal issues with those who decide they'd rather choose to screw whores for their entire lives (or not) and live entirely on their own. Everyone has the freedom to choose their own path, and one right for me is not necessarily right for you.Tano wrote:A life's journey doesn't need partners, and a truly independent man is never beguiled by a woman. EVER.
Anything that has a potential to 'come and go' - is not true. Relationships - come and go. Not true.
My issue is with the underlying attitude demonstrated by the poster that clearly shows they lack any real empathy with and ability to relate to women but only seek them as sex partners. That to me indicates an emotional void and inter-personal relationship issues. Oh, and the idea expressed by the OP and yourself that this is the only "true" path, and that anyone who has a relationship is somehow compromising some pure state of independence that is some ideal to be strived for. This is to me absurd, and contradictory to all we know from science and other fields. While you and the OP have this ideal, it is not shared either as a value or even as positive by a large number of people, more than likely the vast majority of people. People seek community rather than independence for the most part in my experience.
As to your statement about temporary things being untrue, this is the opposite of the Buddhist principle that ALL things are temporary and the only constant is change. While I'm not Buddhist, there are truths expressed within Buddhism and other religions that reflect the reality we experience and many of these are confirmed through science. The precept I noted is one that strikes me as being more true than false, and it directly contradicts what you take to be as an incontrovertible established truth. On what basis do you believe the statement "anything that has the potential to 'come and go' - is not true?" to be a basic and universal truth?
To this: "While you and the OP have this ideal, it is not shared either as a value or even as positive by a large number of people, more than likely the vast majority of people."
It contains the premise that the majority is always correct. The opposite is true.
To this: "On what basis do you believe the statement "anything that has the potential to 'come and go' - is not true?" to be a basic and universal truth?" I will answer with your own words....
ALL things are temporary and the only constant is change.
- Jacked Camry
- Is the World Outside still there ?
- Reactions: 2
- Posts: 5674
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 2:53 pm
It's hardly revolutionary to acknowledge that there are different paths. And just because something becomes evident to a majority of people is hardly a basis for saying the opposite is therefore true. That's just being contrary. You seem to hold that some things are absolute and make grandiose statements to that effect without any real justification for them. I am sure that YOU believe these things to be true, just as much as I am sure that I and many others do not. If you try to make a case then perhaps we have a basis to debate them.Tano wrote:Thank you for acknowledging the fact there are different paths.Jacked Camry wrote:Certainly one can choose any path they want, and there's nothing wrong with that. Furthermore, I've no personal issues with those who decide they'd rather choose to screw whores for their entire lives (or not) and live entirely on their own. Everyone has the freedom to choose their own path, and one right for me is not necessarily right for you.Tano wrote:A life's journey doesn't need partners, and a truly independent man is never beguiled by a woman. EVER.
Anything that has a potential to 'come and go' - is not true. Relationships - come and go. Not true.
My issue is with the underlying attitude demonstrated by the poster that clearly shows they lack any real empathy with and ability to relate to women but only seek them as sex partners. That to me indicates an emotional void and inter-personal relationship issues. Oh, and the idea expressed by the OP and yourself that this is the only "true" path, and that anyone who has a relationship is somehow compromising some pure state of independence that is some ideal to be strived for. This is to me absurd, and contradictory to all we know from science and other fields. While you and the OP have this ideal, it is not shared either as a value or even as positive by a large number of people, more than likely the vast majority of people. People seek community rather than independence for the most part in my experience.
As to your statement about temporary things being untrue, this is the opposite of the Buddhist principle that ALL things are temporary and the only constant is change. While I'm not Buddhist, there are truths expressed within Buddhism and other religions that reflect the reality we experience and many of these are confirmed through science. The precept I noted is one that strikes me as being more true than false, and it directly contradicts what you take to be as an incontrovertible established truth. On what basis do you believe the statement "anything that has the potential to 'come and go' - is not true?" to be a basic and universal truth?
To this: "While you and the OP have this ideal, it is not shared either as a value or even as positive by a large number of people, more than likely the vast majority of people."
It contains the premise that the majority is always correct. The opposite is true.
To this: "On what basis do you believe the statement "anything that has the potential to 'come and go' - is not true?" to be a basic and universal truth?" I will answer with your own words....
ALL things are temporary and the only constant is change.
Then when you do, you state something that means the opposite of what you previously stated. So it's hard to even understand what your position is.
- Lucky Lucan
- K440 Knight Captain
- Reactions: 761
- Posts: 22525
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:24 pm
- Location: The Pearl of the Orient
Sounds like the OP has never been to Thailand.Is it a coincidence how people in America are so quick to anger and lose their temper, whereas in a place like Thailand where prostitution is legal and accepted, people are very laid back and cool headed?
Romantic Cambodia is dead and gone. It's with McKinley in the grave.
Jacked Camry wrote:
Thank you for acknowledging the fact there are different paths.
To this: "While you and the OP have this ideal, it is not shared either as a value or even as positive by a large number of people, more than likely the vast majority of people."
It contains the premise that the majority is always correct. The opposite is true.
To this: "On what basis do you believe the statement "anything that has the potential to 'come and go' - is not true?" to be a basic and universal truth?" I will answer with your own words....
ALL things are temporary and the only constant is change.
My position is very clear. I called the OP 'a brutally honest account' and support it for that reason.It's hardly revolutionary to acknowledge that there are different paths. And just because something becomes evident to a majority of people is hardly a basis for saying the opposite is therefore true. That's just being contrary. You seem to hold that some things are absolute and make grandiose statements to that effect without any real justification for them. I am sure that YOU believe these things to be true, just as much as I am sure that I and many others do not. If you try to make a case then perhaps we have a basis to debate them.
Then when you do, you state something that means the opposite of what you previously stated. So it's hard to even understand what your position is.
If you are honest with yourself to the very last degree you will notice this... After water, food and shelter the next primary drive is sex. The majority of humans are satisfied in the first three to a degree.. why, because they are alive due to obtaining water, food and shelter. Sex is next, however, it is harder to obtain because it involves a second party, and most people mistakenly believe they need a second party to feel sexually fullfilled (not true, but beyond the scope of this post).
Sex is what rules the world. Not money. Women have what men want and crave, just think back especially to your younger years, and how many girls you wanted to bed, without the means of doing so. Did you want to marry all of them? No. Did you want to have sex with them? Yes. Did you want it nice and easy, without the game of 'I will do this for you, be nice to you, and hope we will have a nookie as a result'?
It makes no difference HOW it is obtained, through 'marriage', 'relationships' or paying for sex. because in ALL cases - one pays in some way, be it material or mental/emotional costs.
Women also have vested interests. They want security. Men want sex. Both parties lie in order to get what they want. As long as their needs are met and the costs do not too high from the benefits - 'relationships' remain stable.
If you go penniless even the most forgiving woman will eventually kick you out. If she refuses sex to a man, even the most patient man will look for it elsewhere eventually.
Relationships are transactions, masked through words of human 'love'. The law of Life is 'give and take'. I simply prefer an honest transaction to a dishonest game playing.
- Jacked Camry
- Is the World Outside still there ?
- Reactions: 2
- Posts: 5674
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 2:53 pm
So you're basically a Marxist when it comes to relationships with other humans. Kind of odd, but okay, whatever. I don't look at your basic requirements as commodities nor do I compartmentalize my life such that I ensure that I compile the necessary "means of reproduction" to overcome the objective conditions of being a horny male.Tano wrote:Jacked Camry wrote:
Thank you for acknowledging the fact there are different paths.
To this: "While you and the OP have this ideal, it is not shared either as a value or even as positive by a large number of people, more than likely the vast majority of people."
It contains the premise that the majority is always correct. The opposite is true.
To this: "On what basis do you believe the statement "anything that has the potential to 'come and go' - is not true?" to be a basic and universal truth?" I will answer with your own words....
ALL things are temporary and the only constant is change.My position is very clear. I called the OP 'a brutally honest account' and support it for that reason.It's hardly revolutionary to acknowledge that there are different paths. And just because something becomes evident to a majority of people is hardly a basis for saying the opposite is therefore true. That's just being contrary. You seem to hold that some things are absolute and make grandiose statements to that effect without any real justification for them. I am sure that YOU believe these things to be true, just as much as I am sure that I and many others do not. If you try to make a case then perhaps we have a basis to debate them.
Then when you do, you state something that means the opposite of what you previously stated. So it's hard to even understand what your position is.
If you are honest with yourself to the very last degree you will notice this... After water, food and shelter the next primary drive is sex. The majority of humans are satisfied in the first three to a degree.. why, because they are alive due to obtaining water, food and shelter. Sex is next, however, it is harder to obtain because it involves a second party, and most people mistakenly believe they need a second party to feel sexually fullfilled (not true, but beyond the scope of this post).
Sex is what rules the world. Not money. Women have what men want and crave, just think back especially to your younger years, and how many girls you wanted to bed, without the means of doing so. Did you want to marry all of them? No. Did you want to have sex with them? Yes. Did you want it nice and easy, without the game of 'I will do this for you, be nice to you, and hope we will have a nookie as a result'?
It makes no difference HOW it is obtained, through 'marriage', 'relationships' or paying for sex. because in ALL cases - one pays in some way, be it material or mental/emotional costs.
Women also have vested interests. They want security. Men want sex. Both parties lie in order to get what they want. As long as their needs are met and the costs do not too high from the benefits - 'relationships' remain stable.
If you go penniless even the most forgiving woman will eventually kick you out. If she refuses sex to a man, even the most patient man will look for it elsewhere eventually.
Relationships are transactions, masked through words of human 'love'. The law of Life is 'give and take'. I simply prefer an honest transaction to a dishonest game playing.
My wife I am sure would not leave me even if I were penniless, we're in it for the long haul and fell in love when I essentially had nothing to my name and we remained that way for the majority of our time together (fortunately no longer). I feel sorry for you that you've never had relationships that were not transactional. When you look at life in such material terms, it's not a recipe for long-term happiness in my opinion. But to each their own. I would reckon I'm as happy as you are if not more so, and I'm not deluding myself in any way to achieve that state nor do I compromise my principles any more than you do. Possibly less. There are many pathways to happiness, yours is not one that seems the most probable one.
Not Marxist. Realist, no pink coloured glasses which most people don so eagerly. I don't have morals, just an inner compass which allows to be clean in my conduct with other human beings. And only one principle which I would like to kick into oblivion, but here... we are what we areJacked Camry wrote:Tano wrote:Jacked Camry wrote:
I would reckon I'm as happy as you are if not more so, and I'm not deluding myself in any way to achieve that state nor do I compromise my principles any more than you do. Possibly less. There are many pathways to happiness, yours is not one that seems the most probable one.
Happiness is a myth. Being content, however, is another matter.
- Phuket2006
- The Internet is my Friend
- Reactions: 100
- Posts: 6989
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 7:00 am
there is a lot to be said for both
"Happiness is like junk, once u start getting a bit you want more"
"Happiness is like junk, once u start getting a bit you want more"
"We are turning into a nation of whimpering slaves to Fear—fear of war, fear of poverty, fear of random terrorism, or suddenly getting locked up in a military detention camp on vague charges of being a Terrorist sympathizer." HST
- spitthedog
- Is the World Outside still there ?
- Reactions: 124
- Posts: 5721
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 10:19 pm
You can't be hiding yer wallet under the mattress before you go to sleep every night indefinitely though can you? It would surely frazzle the nerves.
And who want's to spend the rest of the lives having pretend make believe conversations in hooker joints every night?
I view sex workers as like working in a chocolate factory - after awile they must hate the smell of chocolate. Isn't it the same with cocks?
#Sodoffyouskank
And who want's to spend the rest of the lives having pretend make believe conversations in hooker joints every night?
I view sex workers as like working in a chocolate factory - after awile they must hate the smell of chocolate. Isn't it the same with cocks?
#Sodoffyouskank
"I don't care what the people are thinking, i ain't drunk i'm just drinking"
- Felgerkarb
- Sir Felgerkarb, Kt Pb
- Reactions: 240
- Posts: 9140
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:22 am
- Location: Castle Felgerkarb, Felgerkarbia (Formerly Preah Vihear)
- Contact:
spitthedog wrote:You can't be hiding yer wallet under the mattress before you go to sleep every night indefinitely though can you? It would surely frazzle the nerves.
And who want's to spend the rest of the lives having pretend make believe conversations in hooker joints every night?
I view sex workers as like working in a chocolate factory - after awile they must hate the smell of chocolate. Isn't it the same with cocks?
#Sodoffyouskank
You find a few you like and keep them on speed dial, they will bar fine themselves and meet you where ever. Never have to set foot in one until you need to change up the roster. Or so I have heard...
====================
Why are the gods such vicious cunts?
Where is the god of tits and wine?
Why are the gods such vicious cunts?
Where is the god of tits and wine?
spitthedog wrote:You can't be hiding yer wallet under the mattress before you go to sleep every night indefinitely though can you? It would surely frazzle the nerves.
And who want's to spend the rest of the lives having pretend make believe conversations in hooker joints every night?
I view sex workers as like working in a chocolate factory - after awile they must hate the smell of chocolate. Isn't it the same with cocks?
#Sodoffyouskank
All of our lives are spent having pretend make-believe conversations, be it in hooker joints or trying to pick up a girl at a work do/bar/music festival etc. etc. It is just that the esteemed majority are blissfully unaware of own primeval drives behind those conversations.
I am not saying 'Do not enter relationships of any kind'. I am saying 'Do so with your eyes open. You are scared shitless of being on your own, of feeling 'lonely', of being unsatisfied, if not attached to another body/mind. Have the decency not lie to either yourself or the object of your inten... attentions.'
I don't know what sex workers feel about cocks. I would say they are normal women (and men), with the usual assortment of human emotions and physical desires, who separate 'work' and 'play' in their minds.
P.S. Women are very aware of men who do not 'need' them and find those most attractive.
I've lived with a hooker or two in my younger days (house mates) and they used to love fucking the young guys at work, though that wore off over time. Also had lesbian neighbours by day who were hookers by night.Tano wrote:...I don't know what sex workers feel about cocks...
I find many women are attracted to needy men more than not.P.S. Women are very aware of men who do not 'need' them and find those most attractive.
"Not my circus, not my monkeys" - KiR
spitthedog wrote:
And who want's to spend the rest of the lives having pretend make believe conversations in hooker joints every night?
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
David Alan Harvey/Magnum Photography & Underage Prostitutes
by Bong Burgundy » Fri Aug 07, 2020 11:00 am » in Thailand, Vietnam, Myanmar and Lao forums - 0 Replies
- 1618 Views
-
Last post by Bong Burgundy
Fri Aug 07, 2020 11:00 am
-
-
- 34 Replies
- 8434 Views
-
Last post by OffRoader
Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:39 am
-
- 2 Replies
- 1966 Views
-
Last post by Lucky Lucan
Sat Feb 13, 2021 1:37 am