You listen here, Felgerkarb. Your posts are not one-sided anti-Trump tirade-ish enough for our collective liking which means you are THISCLOSE to being one of those obviously brainwashed, alt-right, warmongering, knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing, Islamophobic, racist, sexist Donald Trump-loving cunts. Wise-up and accept that the end of civilization is nigh or face the forum consequences. You have been warned!Felgerkarb wrote:Yes because only stupid people believe what they read....wait a minute...
Daily militant extremist attack
"The final straw actually involved my mortal enemy vladimir, who you may or may not know is an insufferable, overposting asshat."
-
- No Joke Howard is my Hero
- Reactions: 0
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2015 9:14 am
I don't understand your comment. The references to Bowling Green, Atlanta and Sweden haven't been read about in the liberal media. They have been cited on live tv or in yesterday's case at his own rally. There is no conspiracy here. These people are quite simply fabricating these attacks that didn't happen and can be easily proven to not have happened.Felgerkarb wrote:Yes because only stupid people believe what they read....wait a minute...
But I guess the truth no longer matters.
I know I'm unloveable. You don't have to tell me. I don't have much in my life, but take it - it's yours.
-
- No Joke Howard is my Hero
- Reactions: 0
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2015 9:14 am
Edwardo wrote:You listen here, Felgerkarb. Your posts are not one-sided anti-Trump tirade-ish enough for our collective liking which means you are THISCLOSE to being one of those obviously brainwashed, alt-right, warmongering, knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing, Islamophobic, racist, sexist Donald Trump-loving cunts. Wise-up and accept that the end of civilization is nigh or face the forum consequences. You have been warned!Felgerkarb wrote:Yes because only stupid people believe what they read....wait a minute...
How about debating the issues instead of acting like this? It would give you more credibility.
Let me ask you. How do you defend or justify the claims the Trump camp is making about terrorist attacks that haven't in fact happened? Does it not bother you that they are so contemptuous of their core support that they can simply feed them these lies, and then ironically rail against fake news?
Serious question.
I know I'm unloveable. You don't have to tell me. I don't have much in my life, but take it - it's yours.
Serious questions? What bullshit. I don't accept your pretend and false binary thought process. "How do you defend or justify...?" Who the fuck says I must defend or justify anything anyone else says or does...especially a fucking politician? Because I don't feel the need to repeatedly and continually post childish insults about Donald Trump or buy into the glaring anti-Trump mainstream media and Khmer440 bias?This Charming Man wrote:How about debating the issues instead of acting like this? It would give you more credibility.
Let me ask you. How do you defend or justify the claims the Trump camp is making about terrorist attacks that haven't in fact happened?
Serious question.
Why should it bother me? "Their core support" can make up their own minds about thow they feel about how the Trump administration is behaving.This Charming Man wrote:Does it not bother you that they are so contemptuous of their core support that they..."
"The final straw actually involved my mortal enemy vladimir, who you may or may not know is an insufferable, overposting asshat."
I remember you saying not long ago that you were sick and tired of being called a liberal or snowflake or whatever just because you openly oppose Trump's policies. Similarly, some of us are bored off our tits about being labelled "brainwashed Trump supporters" because we refuse to climb on the inane and predictable anti-Trump media and K440 hysteria and childish, repetitive name-calling bandwagon. It's the same, pathetic "I get to label you and then that label justifies my stereotyping and insulting you" bullshit. I'm no more or less "angry" than you are.scobienz wrote:Edwardo seems angry about something
"The final straw actually involved my mortal enemy vladimir, who you may or may not know is an insufferable, overposting asshat."
I'm not convinced that's happening.
As for a Khmer440 bias that is nonsense. This is a forum. There is no such thing as a 440 line. The forum is a composite of everyone who rights on it. That is the nature of forums.
There are around a dozen people who post regularly on the Trump threads. I would say half of those post anti-Trump sentiment and half are in favour. How is that biased?
As for a Khmer440 bias that is nonsense. This is a forum. There is no such thing as a 440 line. The forum is a composite of everyone who rights on it. That is the nature of forums.
There are around a dozen people who post regularly on the Trump threads. I would say half of those post anti-Trump sentiment and half are in favour. How is that biased?
You post the links to any posts where you or dipshit Logos (as K440 admin) have banned or threatened to ban a single person in the pro-Trump majority here for their views and direct insults of posters who disagree and I'll post the same for similar threats or actions you've made against the other side. This is the K440 bias...as enforced by admin. And to say it's 50/50 here is laughable. Shall we go poster by poster in the main Trump thread ( and the multiple other threads where Trump insults got thrown in for good measure) and make a list? Let's let The Charming Man or David L. compile that data.scobienz wrote:I'm not convinced that's happening.
As for a Khmer440 bias that is nonsense. This is a forum. There is no such thing as a 440 line. The forum is a composite of everyone who rights on it. That is the nature of forums.
There are around a dozen people who post regularly on the Trump threads. I would say half of those post anti-Trump sentiment and half are in favour. How is that biased?
"The final straw actually involved my mortal enemy vladimir, who you may or may not know is an insufferable, overposting asshat."
Posters haven't been banned for posting legitimate views. Otherwise there would be no posters posting those views. Posters have been given breaks for issuing direct insults against other members or for consistently posting hate-filled racist rants like desiring to drive lorries into mosques to kill Muslims. That shit simply isn't tolerated.
As for numbers of posters - I'm not here to provide stats. If there are more anti Trunp posts than pro that is a reflection of personal views of members, not some kind of institutional bias. There is a difference. Posters are free to post what they like providing it doesn't contravene forum guidelines. There has to be a semblance of order here.
As for numbers of posters - I'm not here to provide stats. If there are more anti Trunp posts than pro that is a reflection of personal views of members, not some kind of institutional bias. There is a difference. Posters are free to post what they like providing it doesn't contravene forum guidelines. There has to be a semblance of order here.
scobienz wrote:There are around a dozen people who post regularly on the Trump threads. I would say half of those post anti-Trump sentiment and half are in favour. How is that biased?
First you stated some off-the-cuff, loose stats and which are obviously wrong, then you back down saying you don't do stats. How very Trump-ish of you.scobienz wrote:As for numbers of posters - I'm not here to provide stats. If there are more anti Trunp posts than pro that is a reflection of personal views of members, no to some kind of institutional bias.
"The final straw actually involved my mortal enemy vladimir, who you may or may not know is an insufferable, overposting asshat."
obviously wrong? I dunno. You're the one making charges of a 440 institutional bias; you provide the stats.
I'm simply making the point that the views expressed on the forum - on any forum - are the composite of the posters who post on that forum, not this amorphous entity you label as 440.
And that posters can express their views - and do with gusto - providing they stay within posting guidelines.
Personal insults against posters on either side don't help the debate. I would love to see a robust and thoughtful rebuttal of some of the anti-Trump posts I read and post. Sadly it doesn't seem forthcoming. Instead they are dismissed as being biased.
Of course they are biased. That's the nature of debate.
Anyway,for the record I like your posts even if i don't agree with them.
I'm simply making the point that the views expressed on the forum - on any forum - are the composite of the posters who post on that forum, not this amorphous entity you label as 440.
And that posters can express their views - and do with gusto - providing they stay within posting guidelines.
Personal insults against posters on either side don't help the debate. I would love to see a robust and thoughtful rebuttal of some of the anti-Trump posts I read and post. Sadly it doesn't seem forthcoming. Instead they are dismissed as being biased.
Of course they are biased. That's the nature of debate.
Anyway,for the record I like your posts even if i don't agree with them.
And for the record, I invoked Godwin's Law many pages ago.scobienz wrote:Anyway,for the record I like your posts even if i don't agree with them.
If you don't know where you're going, any road takes you there.
- salvajeuno
- I Am Losing It All to the Internet
- Reactions: 0
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2016 2:54 am
- Location: Cat Lady Towers
Playboy wrote:'440: Not an Amorphous Entity'
Hum, not sure that scans well as a slogan ??!
இ லொவெ ம்ய் டௌக்ஹ்டெர்ஸ் மொரெ தன் அன்ய்தின்க் இன் தெ வொர்ல்ட்
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post