by Franz » Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:21 pm
hedonismbot wrote:Sex sells, but child sex gets donations.
I've got the same impression so far.
These multinational NGOs know very well the score and they're leaders in the multibillion aid industry, they're earning such a shitload of money they can easily bribe governments and dictate their rules ... now they start with laws against child-sex, tomorrow they will ask for smoking bans, then they will proceed ranting on fat foods, soft drinks, free-speech, sexual freedom, feminism, they're not gonna stop until cambodia will be as rich and modern as Singapore and fully americanized, and then again they will make money crying out with the next heartquake, flood, typhoon, or any other natural disaster involving children and poors in the countryside.
They must be angry at the fact prostitution in cambodia is going down and the living standards are going up, i guess they're already waiting in line for the day Burma will allow them setting up in Rangoon and start all over again, after all cambodia is so '90s and it's been squeezed long enough.
You see, these guys are untouchable, they've too much money power and influence, western newspapers are afraid to write against the NGOs especially if they're sponsored by them, there are some bloggers and ex volunteers speaking out on blogs and forum but this is a drop in the ocean, and if you really become a problem for them they will call their lawyers and make sure you get out pennyless and with your reputation destroyed.
In UK you can openly ask for a ban of christmas or jesus in schools or public places but if you dare pointing the finger at the top NGOs you can end up in jail.
Now again, if just these gullible donors could know what's going on .... but instead what i've read so far is gullible donors admitting their mistakes and asking suggestion about other good NGOs ... see there's no cure for this kind of people ... they believe in the concept of the single bad apple but they can't accept the reality of the whole rotten aid industry on a worldwide scale.
[quote="hedonismbot"]Sex sells, but child sex gets donations.[/quote]
I've got the same impression so far.
These multinational NGOs know very well the score and they're leaders in the multibillion aid industry, they're earning such a shitload of money they can easily bribe governments and dictate their rules ... now they start with laws against child-sex, tomorrow they will ask for smoking bans, then they will proceed ranting on fat foods, soft drinks, free-speech, sexual freedom, feminism, they're not gonna stop until cambodia will be as rich and modern as Singapore and fully americanized, and then again they will make money crying out with the next heartquake, flood, typhoon, or any other natural disaster involving children and poors in the countryside.
They must be angry at the fact prostitution in cambodia is going down and the living standards are going up, i guess they're already waiting in line for the day Burma will allow them setting up in Rangoon and start all over again, after all cambodia is so '90s and it's been squeezed long enough.
You see, these guys are untouchable, they've too much money power and influence, western newspapers are afraid to write against the NGOs especially if they're sponsored by them, there are some bloggers and ex volunteers speaking out on blogs and forum but this is a drop in the ocean, and if you really become a problem for them they will call their lawyers and make sure you get out pennyless and with your reputation destroyed.
In UK you can openly ask for a ban of christmas or jesus in schools or public places but if you dare pointing the finger at the top NGOs you can end up in jail.
Now again, if just these gullible donors could know what's going on .... but instead what i've read so far is gullible donors admitting their mistakes and asking suggestion about other good NGOs ... see there's no cure for this kind of people ... they believe in the concept of the single bad apple but they can't accept the reality of the whole rotten aid industry on a worldwide scale.