by violet » Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:02 pm
it is but I stand by it. re-read his situation. tell me how it would have been better to live on as he was. he was partially paralysed, without support from family, accumulating debt in hospital, unable to travel, needing physio, etc. etc. It would have been crippling financially to have got him back to the US for the treatment he required, if in fact he was able to be relocated. Without insurance covering evacuation, that alone would have cost a fortune and reports were that his family weren't taking it seriously/weren't interested... although the presence of his wife by his side when he died might mean that was an incorrect assumption made by others.
it is but I stand by it. re-read his situation. tell me how it would have been better to live on as he was. he was partially paralysed, without support from family, accumulating debt in hospital, unable to travel, needing physio, etc. etc. It would have been crippling financially to have got him back to the US for the treatment he required, if in fact he was able to be relocated. Without insurance covering evacuation, that alone would have cost a fortune and reports were that his family weren't taking it seriously/weren't interested... although the presence of his wife by his side when he died might mean that was an incorrect assumption made by others.