by Fred Edwards » Sun Jul 24, 2016 11:32 pm
Jacked Camry wrote:Fred Edwards wrote:Jacked Camry wrote:Fred Edwards wrote:Paris
So this is, like, 0.001 of a picture. You reckon it costs $40,000/km length?
What force is stronger, the power of rivers or oceans? I can give examples and pics of both where vegetation is used to stop erosion . Your call?
We're talking major rivers in sub-tropical lowland/floodplain Southeast Asia. Give me what you can find that most closely approximates those conditions.
Why are you concerned only with examples from Southeast Asia, if I was asking the question I would want examples of rivers with similar peak flow rate and volume along with similar soil types. But either way it doesn't matter.
I will remind you what you and I posted
Fred Edwards wrote:Jacked Camry wrote:You'd never be able to adequately protect 80m length of riverbank for $40,000.
A cofferdam would be half if not a third of that to build.Broken into small sections it should be workable for a small team.Or maybe not I haven't seen the land to make an estimate .
I said I haven't seen it to make that call,but for $40,000 I bet I could and stick $20,000 in my pocket especially if you were paying.
Then I posted
Fred Edwards wrote:violet wrote:scoffer wrote:Fred Edwards wrote:Jacked Camry wrote:You'd never be able to adequately protect 80m length of riverbank for $40,000.
A cofferdam would be half if not a third of that to build.Broken into small sections it should be workable for a small team.Or maybe not I haven't seen the land to make an estimate .
What is a cofferdam?
I googled
temporary barrier for excluding water from an area that is normally submerged.
there are other definitions but I like this one
Yeah can be temporary or permanent. You build a dyke behind it and plant trees and ground cover through a chain link fence, which should stop any erosion events.
You know what a dyke is right? The dyke stops the water the vegetation stops the erosion.
Take note you are the one who made the statement saying it's not possible to build if for $40,000 ,I stated it could be and you got the shits and posted this great reply
Jacked Camry wrote:Fred Edwards wrote:
Yeah can be temporary or permanent. You build a dyke behind it and plant trees and ground cover through a chain link fence, which should stop any erosion events.
As a poster you're a complete idiot. As an engineer, you make Fred Edwards the poster appear a genius. You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
Now are you really trying to say having groung cover and trees does not prevent erosion in any situation(ha ha ) .
So let's get it straight that is what you want me to prove right? You are
mate
But like you say I do not know what the fuck I am talking about, you have the 25 years working with concrete.
[quote="Jacked Camry"][quote="Fred Edwards"][quote="Jacked Camry"][quote="Fred Edwards"]Paris[/quote]
So this is, like, 0.001 of a picture. You reckon it costs $40,000/km length?[/quote]
What force is stronger, the power of rivers or oceans? I can give examples and pics of both where vegetation is used to stop erosion . Your call?[/quote]
We're talking major rivers in sub-tropical lowland/floodplain Southeast Asia. Give me what you can find that most closely approximates those conditions.[/quote]
Why are you concerned only with examples from Southeast Asia, if I was asking the question I would want examples of rivers with similar peak flow rate and volume along with similar soil types. But either way it doesn't matter.
I will remind you what you and I posted
[quote="Fred Edwards"][quote="Jacked Camry"]You'd never be able to adequately protect 80m length of riverbank for $40,000.[/quote]
A cofferdam would be half if not a third of that to build.Broken into small sections it should be workable for a small team.Or maybe not I haven't seen the land to make an estimate .[/quote]
I said I haven't seen it to make that call,but for $40,000 I bet I could and stick $20,000 in my pocket especially if you were paying.
Then I posted
[quote="Fred Edwards"][quote="violet"][quote="scoffer"][quote="Fred Edwards"][quote="Jacked Camry"]You'd never be able to adequately protect 80m length of riverbank for $40,000.[/quote]
A cofferdam would be half if not a third of that to build.Broken into small sections it should be workable for a small team.Or maybe not I haven't seen the land to make an estimate .[/quote]
What is a cofferdam?[/quote]
I googled
temporary barrier for excluding water from an area that is normally submerged.
there are other definitions but I like this one[/quote]
Yeah can be temporary or permanent. You build a dyke behind it and plant trees and ground cover through a chain link fence, which should stop any erosion events.[/quote]
You know what a dyke is right? The dyke stops the water the vegetation stops the erosion. :thumbsup:
Take note you are the one who made the statement saying it's not possible to build if for $40,000 ,I stated it could be and you got the shits and posted this great reply
[quote="Jacked Camry"][quote="Fred Edwards"]
Yeah can be temporary or permanent. You build a dyke behind it and plant trees and ground cover through a chain link fence, which should stop any erosion events.[/quote]
As a poster you're a complete idiot. As an engineer, you make Fred Edwards the poster appear a genius. You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.[/quote]
Now are you really trying to say having groung cover and trees does not prevent erosion in any situation(ha ha ) .
So let's get it straight that is what you want me to prove right? You are :pissed: mate
But like you say I do not know what the fuck I am talking about, you have the 25 years working with concrete.