by springrain » Sat May 25, 2019 7:06 pm
I think you guys are being a bit unfair on TM. She was controlled, as are politicians on all sides of the UK One-party-state, by the party grandees: the men-in-grey-suits.
Any comparison between TM and MT (her female predecessor)would be superfluous, since MT would never have allowed the EU to ride roughshod over Britain's interests.
I feel a bit sorry for TM because she was naive, as all staunch party people are, to believe that her party's philosophy was 'real' when, in fact, all of the policies are designed to further the ruling cabal's interests.
She was a pawn - as will the next 'leader' be - and the pawns will be dispensed with as soon as their usefulness to the Cabal runs out.
I think you guys are being a bit unfair on TM. She was controlled, as are politicians on all sides of the UK One-party-state, by the party grandees: the men-in-grey-suits.
Any comparison between TM and MT (her female predecessor)would be superfluous, since MT would never have allowed the EU to ride roughshod over Britain's interests.
I feel a bit sorry for TM because she was naive, as all staunch party people are, to believe that her party's philosophy was 'real' when, in fact, all of the policies are designed to further the ruling cabal's interests.
She was a pawn - as will the next 'leader' be - and the pawns will be dispensed with as soon as their usefulness to the Cabal runs out.