Sizzled (Another Barang in the Slam)
- vladimir
- Feminist Watch List
- Reactions: 4
- Posts: 34235
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 7:43 am
- Location: mod edit
gavinmac, editing some documents is checking that the English syntax/grammar etc. is correct, as you well know.
I don't think you can, even though it suits your desires, group me in the same category as a lawyer, when the great man-god scabiez has already insisted publicly that he is NOT a lawyer (or did you very conveniently forget that fact?)
Legal documents (as you, again, well know) can range from deeds of sale to leases to divorces to company mergers to land-grabbing.
Let us not forget that I have not been given details of any such potential documents, yet you are assuming that I would do the work, regardless of what it entails, based on an expression of interest.
Then may I assume, based on your flawed and biased logic, that you have never applied for and later declined a position because of any unsavoury/undesirable element?
Your assumption is based purely on circumstantial evidence, speculation, and the testimony of a witness you yourself acknowledge as untrustworthy and unethical, based on public evidence.
Do your homework.
I don't think you can, even though it suits your desires, group me in the same category as a lawyer, when the great man-god scabiez has already insisted publicly that he is NOT a lawyer (or did you very conveniently forget that fact?)
Legal documents (as you, again, well know) can range from deeds of sale to leases to divorces to company mergers to land-grabbing.
Let us not forget that I have not been given details of any such potential documents, yet you are assuming that I would do the work, regardless of what it entails, based on an expression of interest.
Then may I assume, based on your flawed and biased logic, that you have never applied for and later declined a position because of any unsavoury/undesirable element?
Your assumption is based purely on circumstantial evidence, speculation, and the testimony of a witness you yourself acknowledge as untrustworthy and unethical, based on public evidence.
Do your homework.
ירי ילדים והפצצת אזרחים דורש אומץ, כמו גם הטרדה מינית של עובדי ההוראה.
-
- Making Khmer girls cry since 2003
- Reactions: 130
- Posts: 21358
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 10:15 pm
Come on, lawyers "extort money from ignorant people" by charging clients high fees to prepare and file documents, then noble Vladimir applied for a cut of that money for editing law firm documents? Just admit you're a hypocrite, man. Everyone knows it.
Follow my lame Twitter feed: @gavin_mac
- vladimir
- Feminist Watch List
- Reactions: 4
- Posts: 34235
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 7:43 am
- Location: mod edit
gavinmac, has lack of sex fucked up your eyesight?
He's NOT a lawyer. Get it?
Pretty poor rebuttal, even for a retired casino lawyer.
He's NOT a lawyer. Get it?
Pretty poor rebuttal, even for a retired casino lawyer.
ירי ילדים והפצצת אזרחים דורש אומץ, כמו גם הטרדה מינית של עובדי ההוראה.
vladimir wrote:gavinmac, has lack of sex fucked up your eyesight?
He's NOT a lawyer. Get it?
Pretty poor rebuttal, even for a retired casino lawyer.
Cretin
Do you think I would be paying you out of my personal savings or do you think you would have been paid by an evil law firm?
You're a fucking hypocrite.
I apologize for revealing a pm as a general principle. I did it because you raised my job in a discussion which had nothing to do with my job. I don't apologize for exposing you as a hypocrite who is now trying to disingenuously distinguish between doing work for me or doing work for a law firm, the very people you despise for exploiting people.
Last edited by Anonymous on Thu Apr 03, 2014 9:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Making Khmer girls cry since 2003
- Reactions: 130
- Posts: 21358
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 10:15 pm
I hear the U.S. embassy may be hiring, maybe he should shoot his C.V. over there too.
Follow my lame Twitter feed: @gavin_mac
- Falcon Randwick
- Damn, I just saw my Internet Bill !
- Reactions: 3
- Posts: 4381
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 2:55 pm
Mind you, in my (limited) experience with the legal profession that is actually true. The $14,500 bill for legal services that my girlfriend received when she sued me - it's a long story, she sued me for insurance purposes while we were still together and so remained for another five years - there were extraneous charges for bullshit such as $5 for speaking on the phone with our lawyer's secretary to arrange an appointment, $100 for a brief (less than five minutes) telephone conversation between our lawyer and our barrister while we were sitting in his office with him and already being charged for the consultation, but the topper of all toppers was being charged $30 for the secretary to make up the bill itself.gavinmac wrote:lawyers "extort money from ignorant people" by charging clients high fees to prepare and file documents
If that experience of lawyers is in any way indicative of their general behaviour, and I believe it's not far off the mark then yes, you can say that lawyers are indeed greedy cunts. Present company excepted, naturally...
Like Potato Stars on facebook. We're likable...
https://www.facebook.com/potstars1
...and make your ears hate you by listening to us here
https://soundcloud.com/falcon-randwick
https://www.facebook.com/potstars1
...and make your ears hate you by listening to us here
https://soundcloud.com/falcon-randwick
Calling someone out for trying to make a living doing what he can, really? Because you're charging your clients so fairly with no money cut, because you don't care about money right? You work for fuck all practically giving your stuff away way below market price. And you're not a hypocrite.gavinmac wrote:Come on, lawyers "extort money from ignorant people" by charging clients high fees to prepare and file documents, then noble Vladimir applied for a cut of that money for editing law firm documents? Just admit you're a hypocrite, man. Everyone knows it.
What's your job, what do you earn, what do you charge your clients and what the fuck is this thread about again? And you guys wonder why people drop the board like flies. This shit right here.
Guess what Einstein, some people actually hate their jobs and often even themselves.
Time to take your own sage advise bud.......
vladimir wrote:Just a constructive word of advice here...
If you argue with one person, it may be either person's fault.
If you find that everyone is arguing with you, it's time for a little self-examination.
And then CHANGE.
-
- I live above an internet cafe
- Reactions: 0
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 10:59 pm
Andy Howard apparently. Whoever he is!qq wrote:and what the fuck is this thread about again?
Maybe he needs a lawyer.
Keep it up guys this is enthralling reading.
Aw shucks - another potential job offer gone west....scobienz wrote:Fattism is much more acceptable than racism, homophism, sexism, ageism etc because being fat is - by and large - a choice. I'd never hire a lardass..............
- vladimir
- Feminist Watch List
- Reactions: 4
- Posts: 34235
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 7:43 am
- Location: mod edit
1. I didn't really take note who would be paying me. Was it stated? Do you work for a law firm then? So you denied it previously, but now you're counter-denying that?scobienz wrote:Do you think I would be paying you out of my personal savings
I apologize for revealing a pm as a general principle.
2. Your apology is dismissed for what it is, devious and insincere. You're an unprincipled Uriah Heep, a person in a lofty position who claims the high moral ground and who claims to be an example. You are a wannabe who somehow got out of wherever to where you are today, maybe by revealing confidential documents/communications (it seems to come easily). The only reason you're apologising is that behaviour which you consider fine (read your post) has now been condemned by people and now you are forced to admit it, albeit begrudgingly.
3. You have posted many times on this forum that you are NOT a lawyer. Do you deny it?
4. If you are indeed NOT a lawyer (not that we should trust someone who breaches confidence publicly) then how was my enquiry interpreted as agreeing to work with lawyers? I signed a legal document (one which is generally available on the internet for free) to rent my house. Does that make my landlord evil? Or me for signing it? I'm just confused as to when being a lawyer/non-lawyer is moral or immoral. Enlighten me, Jesus.
5. If you cannot be trusted to keep PM's safe on a public forum, can you at least be trusted to keep facts with which you come into contact every day at work confidential? Just asking.
Goodnight.
Last edited by vladimir on Thu Apr 03, 2014 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ירי ילדים והפצצת אזרחים דורש אומץ, כמו גם הטרדה מינית של עובדי ההוראה.
- vladimir
- Feminist Watch List
- Reactions: 4
- Posts: 34235
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 7:43 am
- Location: mod edit
I know scobienz thinks he's the All-pervasive God-Allah, but one person is not my idea of everybody. And gavinmac and a few others are lawyers, they get insecure if anyone understands that lawyers can also be shysters.DanCooper wrote:Time to take your own sage advise bud.......
vladimir wrote:Just a constructive word of advice here...
If you argue with one person, it may be either person's fault.
If you find that everyone is arguing with you, it's time for a little self-examination.
And then CHANGE.
(Sorry to pop your bubble)
ירי ילדים והפצצת אזרחים דורש אומץ, כמו גם הטרדה מינית של עובדי ההוראה.
It's not like you said it in a closed room so the secrecy was already void from start. Transmitting a secret message over the unencrypted public Internet the way that you obviously did by using this board's private messaging function you can, through the nature of the Internet, expect the exact same confidentiality as if you had transmitted the message through a postcard. Just saying.vladimir wrote:5. If you cannot be trusted to keep PM's safe on a public forum, can you at least be trusted to keep facts with which you come into contact every day at work confidential? Just asking.
Had you however spoken to him through a medium which doesn't use a bunch of (practically) messengers, like telling him alone in person, then you'd have more of a moral case here.
Quite rotten though, indeed.
Huh? When did I deny working for a law firm? I told you that when we met.vladimir wrote:1. I didn't really take note who would be paying me. Was it stated? Do you work for a law firm then? So you denied it previously, but now you're counter-denying that?scobienz wrote:Do you think I would be paying you out of my personal savings
I apologize for revealing a pm as a general principle.
2. Your apology is dismissed for what it is, devious and insincere. You're an unprincipled Uriah Heep, a person in a lofty position who claims the high moral ground and who claims to be an example. You are a wannabe who somehow got out of wherever to where you are today, maybe by revealing confidential documents/communications (it seems to come easily). The only reason you're apologising is that behaviour which you consider fine (read your post) has now been condemned by people and now you are forced to admit it, albeit begrudgingly.
3. You have posted many times on this forum that you are NOT a lawyer. Do you deny it?
4. If you are indeed NOT a lawyer (not that we should trust someone who breaches confidence publicly) then how was my enquiry interpreted as agreeing to work with lawyers? I signed a legal document (one which is generally available on the internet for free) to rent my house. Does that make my landlord evil? Or me for signing it? I'm just confused as to when being a lawyer/non-lawyer is moral or immoral. Enlighten me, Jesus.
5. If you cannot be trusted to keep PM's safe on a public forum, can you at least be trusted to keep facts with which you come into contact every day at work confidential? Just asking.
Goodnight.
Are you drinking tonight?
Do you seriously think I would be paying for you out of my personal money? You're squirming like a pathetic worm caught out finally.
Revealing a pm was wrong. But revealing you for the sad arse hypocrite who is now trying to suggest you would be working for me personally makes it worthwhile.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Anyone know this down and out Barang?
by Bong Burgundy » Mon Feb 06, 2023 2:11 pm » in Cambodia Speakeasy - 2 Replies
- 1571 Views
-
Last post by nerdlinger
Mon Feb 06, 2023 10:58 pm
-
-
- 18 Replies
- 2221 Views
-
Last post by Stokely
Fri Feb 23, 2024 11:10 am
-
-
Barang's Kampot Manifesto in 24 points
by Bong Burgundy » Tue Oct 10, 2023 8:11 am » in Cambodia Speakeasy - 54 Replies
- 9219 Views
-
Last post by Baconroll
Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:12 am
-
-
-
Barang knocked out by strong wind
by Bong Burgundy » Sun Mar 01, 2020 1:58 am » in Cambodia Speakeasy - 9 Replies
- 2877 Views
-
Last post by khmerhit
Thu Mar 05, 2020 10:28 pm
-