scobienz wrote:What is the alternative?vladimir wrote:The forum allows the post. That means they do not disapprove of it...or, logically, it would not be there. I agree 440 itself is not making the claim, but they are enabling it to be published.That's the moral point.scobienz wrote:In what way is Khmer440 complicit in the alleged slander?limone wrote: I would highly suggest Khmer440 immediately stop being complicit in such slander. .
Would you have me park every such post - indeed every post made here - to fact check and verify from a legal standpoint? That's ridiculous.
440 is neither morally nor legally responsible for the posts that posters make. You - the posters are responsible for your posts. I know that notion of personal responsibility is anathema to some, but such is life. I'm not your moral guardian. It's an interactive website in which people like you post whatever random bollocks springs to mind and for which you - if called upon - should be held accountable.
This is Maybe the First time I've agreed with you Scobienz and found you reasonable. Now where is that jar of consistency...?