Khmer440 drink up - 20 October
"And the 15% who don’t have their posts/threads moderated by TTM."
Please do unmoderate them and let them have at it. We will thus hopefully be able to identify them and put them in custody of the Latter Day Saints for deportation to Kolob.
Please do unmoderate them and let them have at it. We will thus hopefully be able to identify them and put them in custody of the Latter Day Saints for deportation to Kolob.
I'm not going to watch some random video to hear someone explain what you think your opinion is. There's nothing wrong with people on either side of the sex trade. I won't partake. We can leave it at that.
"Let it be known that 85% of Khmer440 posters think taking wives and girlfriends to hooker bars is a great idea."
I venture that a nearly equal percentage have found wives and girlfriends in such bars and are damn glad of it.
I venture that a nearly equal percentage have found wives and girlfriends in such bars and are damn glad of it.
"I'm not going to watch..."
I'm so confident that it will be worth your while that, were it in my power, I would prevent you from watching it unless you gave me 2 lady drink tickets for the privilege.
I'm so confident that it will be worth your while that, were it in my power, I would prevent you from watching it unless you gave me 2 lady drink tickets for the privilege.
I watched it. I expected it to be some political rant or something. Two drinks on me if you bump into me.
- The third man
- 440 Member in Exile
- Reactions: 0
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 6:28 pm
I totally agree there is a place on here for such debate.ផោមក្លិនស្អុយ wrote:I wouldn’t go.
No judgement on those who do or to those who work there but it’s just my personal decision.
I guess my opinion and GMJS’s may not be so different we just may express it differently.
I do find it very strange that that particular debate has been suppressed by TTM. There are plenty of ‘pro’ (for want of a better word) voices on here who speak very freely but one prominent dissenter - who actually can type a coherent debate gets shut down.
Surely there is a place on here for such debate - it is pretty relevant to Cambodia.
And I have no issue with GMJS's or anybody's opinions. I do have issues when he derails the 440 meet-up thread with pimp rants, personal attacks and encourages a boycott of our event for puritan / Calvinist / Victorian values.
I encourage him and anybody else to express those opinions but in a separate, dedicated thread.
Which could be called "would you take your wife or girlfriend to a girlie bar?".
"...a boycott of our event for puritan / Calvinist / Victorian values."
In the manner of a Zen koan, one should boycott the event by attending it.
But Calvin and Victoria might not dig.
In the manner of a Zen koan, one should boycott the event by attending it.
But Calvin and Victoria might not dig.
- Miguelito
- Ordinary Schmo
- Reactions: 219
- Posts: 7053
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:19 pm
- Location: Penh's Hill
I don't agree with every one of TTM's decisions either, by the way. But him and I respect each other, and our own similarities and differences, and will work together to make K440 great again. We don't want to censor GMJS's views, and he's been told he's welcome to express them.The third man wrote:I totally agree there is a place on here for such debate.ផោមក្លិនស្អុយ wrote:I wouldn’t go.
No judgement on those who do or to those who work there but it’s just my personal decision.
I guess my opinion and GMJS’s may not be so different we just may express it differently.
I do find it very strange that that particular debate has been suppressed by TTM. There are plenty of ‘pro’ (for want of a better word) voices on here who speak very freely but one prominent dissenter - who actually can type a coherent debate gets shut down.
Surely there is a place on here for such debate - it is pretty relevant to Cambodia.
And I have no issue with GMJS's or anybody's opinions. I do have issues when he derails the 440 meet-up thread with pimp rants, personal attacks and encourages a boycott of our event for puritan / Calvinist / Victorian values.
I encourage him and anybody else to express those opinions but in a separate, dedicated thread.
Which could be called "would you take your wife or girlfriend to a girlie bar?".
The timing is fortuitous. Maybe I should bring along the Armenian mafia to proctect me if it all goes south.Edwardo wrote:All this petty bickering lately running over several threads should make for an interesting drink-up.
- Loogan
- I've got internet at work
- Reactions: 3
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 5:10 am
- Location: Woofter-Ville.
Ummm... I think this thread's already been derailed judging by the last 20 of so posts.The third man wrote:I totally agree there is a place on here for such debate.ផោមក្លិនស្អុយ wrote:I wouldn’t go.
No judgement on those who do or to those who work there but it’s just my personal decision.
I guess my opinion and GMJS’s may not be so different we just may express it differently.
I do find it very strange that that particular debate has been suppressed by TTM. There are plenty of ‘pro’ (for want of a better word) voices on here who speak very freely but one prominent dissenter - who actually can type a coherent debate gets shut down.
Surely there is a place on here for such debate - it is pretty relevant to Cambodia.
And I have no issue with GMJS's or anybody's opinions. I do have issues when he derails the 440 meet-up thread with pimp rants, personal attacks and encourages a boycott of our event for puritan / Calvinist / Victorian values.
I encourage him and anybody else to express those opinions but in a separate, dedicated thread.
Which could be called "would you take your wife or girlfriend to a girlie bar?".
But then isn't that kinda what this site's been about since whenever? Just never knowing where it's all going to go.
We Will Rock You
-
- No Joke Howard is my Hero
- Reactions: 0
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2015 9:14 am
Miguelito wrote:
I don't agree with every one of TTM's decisions either, by the way. But him and I respect each other, and our own similarities and differences, and will work together to make K440 great again.
And Playboy. Don’t forget Playboy. People like Playboy.
Or doesn’t he want to Make K440 Great Again?
I know I'm unloveable. You don't have to tell me. I don't have much in my life, but take it - it's yours.
- Miguelito
- Ordinary Schmo
- Reactions: 219
- Posts: 7053
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:19 pm
- Location: Penh's Hill
I like Playboy tooThis Charming Man wrote:Miguelito wrote:
I don't agree with every one of TTM's decisions either, by the way. But him and I respect each other, and our own similarities and differences, and will work together to make K440 great again.
And Playboy. Don’t forget Playboy. People like Playboy.
Or doesn’t he want to Make K440 Great Again?
It's not filling me with confidence to want to go. I suspect the people bitching are the ones who have no intention of going.
If Jamie isn't going then what's the point!
If Jamie isn't going then what's the point!
pew, pew, pew, pew!
Miguelito wrote: ................. will work together to make K440 great again.
- The third man
- 440 Member in Exile
- Reactions: 0
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 6:28 pm
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 4 Replies
- 2007 Views
-
Last post by Lucky Lucan
Thu Apr 02, 2020 10:37 pm
-
- 28 Replies
- 6946 Views
-
Last post by spitthedog
Wed Oct 02, 2019 2:58 pm
-
-
Apparent new fines for drink driving
by ផោមក្លិនស្អុយ » Thu Jan 25, 2024 7:57 pm » in Cars and Bikes - 4 Replies
- 652 Views
-
Last post by ផោមក្លិនស្អុយ
Sat Jan 27, 2024 3:50 pm
-
-
-
What percentage of your income do you spend on drink?
by fidget » Sat May 15, 2021 2:15 pm » in Lifestyle - 33 Replies
- 6480 Views
-
Last post by Orichá
Mon May 17, 2021 6:15 pm
-