vladimir wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 4:48 pm
My post was edited before you replied, which you chose to ignore.
The fact remains that the actions of the US seem to indicate that they do not care about children if it costs money to monitor offenders...many known sex offenders have travelled to Cambodia, an din many cases of violence involving small children, wealthy nations and companies have been given a bye.
To be fair, favouritism/ byes for serious offences happens in America too, at least they are consistent in their shenanigans
How many of the 193 countries in the world prosecute citizens who sexually abuse foreign children in foreign countries? The U.S. does. I hear that Australia does. Does any other country do this? Or is it just two?
How many countries have law enforcement agents stationed at their embassies in foreign countries who work with foreign police authorities to track down and arrest and forcibly return its citizens who abuse children abroad? The USA does. Very few other countries do.
How many national law enforcement agencies pay cash to Cambodian police officers and to APLE staff as a reward for finding and arresting that countries child predators in Cambodia? The FBI does.
The USA is as aggressive, or more aggressive, than any other country in the world at tracking down, arresting, prosecuting, and incarcerating citizens who abuse children in foreign countries.
Daniel Johnson abused five Cambodian children in Cambodia, and Cambodian authorities sentenced him to a year in prison. If he were French or Swiss or Dutch or Nigerian or Russian or Mexican or Chinese, wouldn't that have been the end of it? A year in prison for raping five kids and he'd be free as a bird?
Johnson was American. The USA arranged his return to the USA and he was tried there and sentenced to LIFE in prison for molesting five Cambodian children in Cambodia. And your take on all of this is that the USA is weak on child sex crimes and too focused on money?