Bart Dambang wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:14 amFirst it get the Chienese, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Chienese
Then tit get for the Italie, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Italie.
Then it get for the califat, and the WHO is saying everything ok now
Then i get —and there was no one left to speak for me.
New coronavirus spreading rapidly.
-
- I've got nothing better to do
- Reactions: 14
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2020 9:09 am
your forget a mention for all monkey from the laboratoire that seem pretty fukked up by this... i thinking i read 20,000chubacca wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:06 amIf you are over 80 years old and male - then yes panic!!Bart Dambang wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 10:19 amthis I to ask any one who listen every day
but nobody can answer
Otherwise, move along, nothing to see here.....................
plus plus is dead already may be more as WHO trying to find curing
this is the bullshit
this is what start this shit
like AIDS
alway the fukking monkey get it and then have to fix
give them the gun it will be faster more than this
As of 23rd Feb
AGE DEATH RATE (*Death Rate = (number of deaths / number of cases) = probability of dying if infected by the virus (%)
80+ years old
14.8%
70-79 years old
8.0%
60-69 years old
3.6%
50-59 years old
1.3%
40-49 years old
0.4%
30-39 years old
0.2%
20-29 years old
0.2%
10-19 years old
0.2%
0-9 years old
no fatalities
Sex Raio
Male
2.8%
Female
1.7%
PRE-EXISTING CONDITION DEATH RATE*
Cardiovascular disease
10.5%
Diabetes
7.3%
Chronic respiratory disease
6.3%
Hypertension
6.0%
Cancer
5.6%
no pre-existing conditions
0.9%
Bart Dambang wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:34 amyour forget a mention for all monkey from the laboratoire that seem pretty fukked up by this... i thinking i read 20,000chubacca wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:06 amIf you are over 80 years old and male - then yes panic!!Bart Dambang wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 10:19 amthis I to ask any one who listen every day
but nobody can answer
Otherwise, move along, nothing to see here.....................
plus plus is dead already may be more as WHO trying to find curing
this is the bullshit
this is what start this shit
like AIDS
alway the fukking monkey get it and then have to fix
give them the gun it will be faster more than this
-
- OneTrickPony
- Reactions: 64
- Posts: 1640
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 12:48 pm
Good data. Find any good studies on viral load?chubacca wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:36 amAs of 23rd Feb
AGE DEATH RATE (*Death Rate = (number of deaths / number of cases) = probability of dying if infected by the virus (%)
80+ years old
14.8%
70-79 years old
8.0%
60-69 years old
3.6%
50-59 years old
1.3%
40-49 years old
0.4%
30-39 years old
0.2%
20-29 years old
0.2%
10-19 years old
0.2%
0-9 years old
no fatalities
Sex Raio
Male
2.8%
Female
1.7%
PRE-EXISTING CONDITION DEATH RATE*
Cardiovascular disease
10.5%
Diabetes
7.3%
Chronic respiratory disease
6.3%
Hypertension
6.0%
Cancer
5.6%
no pre-existing conditions
0.9%
Up the workers!
-
- I've got nothing better to do
- Reactions: 14
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2020 9:09 am
this be number 2 time you question me. you have problem with comprending me or just think you funnierchubacca wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:38 amBart Dambang wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:34 amyour forget a mention for all monkey from the laboratoire that seem pretty fukked up by this... i thinking i read 20,000chubacca wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:06 amIf you are over 80 years old and male - then yes panic!!Bart Dambang wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 10:19 amthis I to ask any one who listen every day
but nobody can answer
Otherwise, move along, nothing to see here.....................
plus plus is dead already may be more as WHO trying to find curing
this is the bullshit
this is what start this shit
like AIDS
alway the fukking monkey get it and then have to fix
give them the gun it will be faster more than this
So far there is only a couple of published sudies of viral loads, but they are in a small number of patients, and so one can't conclude the difference between those who died and those who have recovered or those who are asymptomatic. The results are kinda as expected where viral loads are high from around 5 days after onset and then drop around 12 - 1 days after. Again, needs a concerted collation of all the results to make a meaningful analysis of viral loads.kungfufighter wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:46 amGood data. Find any good studies on viral load?chubacca wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:36 amAs of 23rd Feb
AGE DEATH RATE (*Death Rate = (number of deaths / number of cases) = probability of dying if infected by the virus (%)
80+ years old
14.8%
70-79 years old
8.0%
60-69 years old
3.6%
50-59 years old
1.3%
40-49 years old
0.4%
30-39 years old
0.2%
20-29 years old
0.2%
10-19 years old
0.2%
0-9 years old
no fatalities
Sex Raio
Male
2.8%
Female
1.7%
PRE-EXISTING CONDITION DEATH RATE*
Cardiovascular disease
10.5%
Diabetes
7.3%
Chronic respiratory disease
6.3%
Hypertension
6.0%
Cancer
5.6%
no pre-existing conditions
0.9%
In the end, viral loads are also symptomatic of how well a patient is. If they are sickly, then no doubt their viral loads will be high due to a suppressed immune resonse, so the cells producing the virus will go on producing till it carks itself. Ordinarily, the bodies own defence system chews up not only the virus, but also the infected cells.........
Not sure if you can access this, but an example of viral loads in 2 patients (https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPd ... %2930113-4)
-
- OneTrickPony
- Reactions: 64
- Posts: 1640
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 12:48 pm
Thanks. So it looks like viral loading has decreased substantially by the 12th day. But they still seem concerned enough not to confirm that data yet. If they did it would rocket the number of survivals, and ease people's paranoia.chubacca wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:58 amSo far there is only a couple of published sudies of viral loads, but they are in a small number of patients, and so one can't conclude the difference between those who died and those who have recovered or those who are asymptomatic. The results are kinda as expected where viral loads are high from around 5 days after onset and then drop around 12 - 1 days after. Again, needs a concerted collation of all the results to make a meaningful analysis of viral loads.kungfufighter wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:46 amGood data. Find any good studies on viral load?chubacca wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:36 amAs of 23rd Feb
AGE DEATH RATE (*Death Rate = (number of deaths / number of cases) = probability of dying if infected by the virus (%)
80+ years old
14.8%
70-79 years old
8.0%
60-69 years old
3.6%
50-59 years old
1.3%
40-49 years old
0.4%
30-39 years old
0.2%
20-29 years old
0.2%
10-19 years old
0.2%
0-9 years old
no fatalities
Sex Raio
Male
2.8%
Female
1.7%
PRE-EXISTING CONDITION DEATH RATE*
Cardiovascular disease
10.5%
Diabetes
7.3%
Chronic respiratory disease
6.3%
Hypertension
6.0%
Cancer
5.6%
no pre-existing conditions
0.9%
In the end, viral loads are also symptomatic of how well a patient is. If they are sickly, then no doubt their viral loads will be high due to a suppressed immune resonse, so the cells producing the virus will go on producing till it carks itself. Ordinarily, the bodies own defence system chews up not only the virus, but also the infected cells.........
Not sure if you can access this, but an example of viral loads in 2 patients (https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPd ... %2930113-4)
Edit: unfortunately, if it's anything like Hep C, it will be 6 months before a 0% viral loading can be given sufficient clearance as to be non contagious.
"In general, we are more comfortable living in a world of absolutes than acknowledging several shades of grey. Unfortunately, the potential for infectivity following a Hepatitis C cure lies somewhere in the grey category. It would be easy to assume that being cured of Hepatitis C totally removes any likelihood of being infectious, but experts’ opinions on this matter vary.
In order to be declared by a physician as ‘cured of Hepatitis C,’ the person’s viral load must be non-detectable six months after the completion of treatment. Known as achieving a sustained virologic response (SVR), this is the goal of Hepatitis C therapy. There are earlier indicators that treatment is going well, such as:
Rapid virologic response – undetectable Hepatitis C RNA one month into treatment
Early virologic response – undetectable Hepatitis C RNA three months into treatment
End-of-treatment response – undetectable Hepatitis C RNA at the end of treatment
Even if any of these earlier results of undetectable Hepatitis C occur, physicians only consider the patient cured if the virus is undetectable at six months post treatment. Many physicians believe that once SVR is attained, the person is cured of Hepatitis C – meaning they no longer harbor the virus and therefore pose no threat of transmitting the infection.
https://www.hepatitiscentral.com/news/c ... ct-others/
The question is: what is the sustained virologic response of COVID-19?
Last edited by kungfufighter on Tue Feb 25, 2020 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Up the workers!
-
- OneTrickPony
- Reactions: 64
- Posts: 1640
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 12:48 pm
Only one as far as I know. But he would never accuse anyone of looking for the services of a ladyboy without any evidence just to increase hits.
Up the workers!
Difference is one can cause liver failure and cancer, the other is a respiratory virus. We all catch colds and sniffles - caused by viruses such as rhinovirus (30-50%), coronavirus (10-15%), influenza (5-15%) and others. Our immune system is very effective in fighting these off, as opposed to Hep C which manages to make itself invisible to the immune system. So you are comparing apples with oranges.kungfufighter wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 5:47 pm
Edit: unfortunately, if it's anything like Hep C, it will be 6 months before a 0% viral loading can be given sufficient clearance as to be non contagious.
So - perhaps we will all catch COVID19 - but for those not in the danger category - nothing to see here folks
(Case in point - of the 650 or so people on the Pacific Princess diagnosed as positive for the virus - over half have showed no symptoms after 2 weeks+ )
- Starving Pelican
- I am a Special Snowflake !!?!
- Reactions: 83
- Posts: 5850
- Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:21 pm
- Location: Cat Food Paradise
Hahahachubacca wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:32 amBart Dambang wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:14 amFirst it get the Chienese, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Chienese
Then tit get for the Italie, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Italie.
Then it get for the califat, and the WHO is saying everything ok now
Then i get —and there was no one left to speak for me.
-
- I've got nothing better to do
- Reactions: 1
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2019 1:15 am
My friend supplied the above text to his "deep black-ops" encryption associate in the underground base below the pentagon. Using advanced linguistical decryption technology it has been concluded that this message was composed by "Kanzi" the ape. one clue was the repetition of the word "monkey"... plus several other "indicators"...Bart Dambang wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:34 amyour forget a mention for all monkey from the laboratoire that seem pretty fukked up by this... i thinking i read 20,000
plus plus is dead already may be more as WHO trying to find curing
this is the bullshit
this is what start this shit
like AIDS
alway the fukking monkey get it and then have to fix
give them the gun it will be faster more than this
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
teacher salaries being reduced by 50% due to coronavirus?
by wolfcreek » Wed Apr 15, 2020 11:04 am » in Cambodia Speakeasy - 19 Replies
- 8815 Views
-
Last post by javiers8
Tue May 05, 2020 9:01 am
-
-
-
Health certificate for visa that you're not infected by coronavirus
by kate_hr » Mon Mar 23, 2020 9:26 am » in Health and fitness - 45 Replies
- 10062 Views
-
Last post by Guest9999
Sat Mar 13, 2021 4:42 pm
-
-
-
Watch out for “dirty farangs” spreading Coronavirus
by Alexandra » Fri Mar 13, 2020 4:19 pm » in Thailand, Vietnam, Myanmar and Lao forums - 2 Replies
- 4958 Views
-
Last post by spitthedog
Fri May 08, 2020 3:32 pm
-
-
-
Resistant malaria spreading in South East Asia
by RiverRat » Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:54 am » in Cambodia Speakeasy - 1 Replies
- 1609 Views
-
Last post by RainMan
Tue Jul 23, 2019 8:04 pm
-
-
-
"The most ridiculous ways companies are trying to profit from the coronavirus outbreak"
by techietraveller84 » Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:56 am » in The Business Forum - 12 Replies
- 4611 Views
-
Last post by rektj00
Fri Mar 24, 2023 4:18 pm
-