They were emails to a range of different people, not the plaintiff. As such they meet the threshold for publication in a defamation case which is as follows:zabadabadoo wrote: ↑Sun Aug 07, 2022 11:50 amOne criterion for defamation is publication.
If Humphrey sent private emails to one guy, that doesn't constitute publication, ergo case is very weak.
Stress and embarrassment by a casino owner? Shouldn't be in the kitchen if you can't stand the heat.
“the communication of the defamatory matter to a third person)2; and. in writing, print or some other permanent form”
As for the guys job, what does that have to do with anything? He’s a private guy doing a job - Humphrey has gone on record saying the guy is effectively offering Humphrey’s wife for sex at the casino.
Where do you even start to unpick this shit show?