Pol Pothead wrote:So you are seriously questioning if such buildings as World Trade 7 are "deathtraps" that, by design, apparently have the tendency to implode for reasons not whatsover related to the catastrophic collapse of two massive 110 story buildings just 100 meters away?
So what part of the collapse of the twin towers should cause WT7 to collapse? Are you suggesting seismic activity? The official government report says that the collapse caused no serious structural damage to WT7 and that the building came down as the result of fire -
http://phys.org/news/2008-08-nist-wtc-collapse.html
FEMA's own report shows they found evidence of molten steel in the material recovered from building seven:
Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting, was readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. A liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel... The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified.
https://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf
Office fires can't melt steel. So if the fires didn't melt the steel, what did? I'm not with the conspiracy theorists on this, the reptilians already told me they weren't involved, but I do think there are questions that haven't been adequately answered.