Dallow Spicer wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2019 6:24 pm
That's an intriguing last like HPUM. As you saying that a straight context between Tulsi Gabbard and Trump, you would vote Gabbard?
If so, why?
Follow up question: What are the chances, do you think, that Trump doesnt actually stand in 2020? He seems shaky to me, and despite what they are saying in public, it's seeming increasingly likely to me that the GOP hierarchy is seeing him as an electoral liability.
I would not be surprised to learn that key advisors are talking to him about making a dignified exit, wrapped up in 'I've done a great job' messaging. The only possible thing stopping him, in my view, is the likelihood he could face various criminal charges once out of office.
I almost feel sorry for him. He is not looking or sounding well at the moment, either physically or mentally.
In short:
Yes, to Gabbard vs Trump.
Leaving aside the fact that she's married to a Kiwi, I think she's campaigning on a platform similar to Trump's 2016 - no more unnecessary wars and ending corruption. She's also a patriot, which I like.
Although it's been fun watching global Trump Derangement Syndrome it's not good for the country - time to focus on domestic issues. It's alarming to see the speed of the US's decline. I also think she could heal some of the divisions as many Trump supporters, and sane democrats like her. In fact, she's had a lot of air-time on Fox.
In my view, she's the only one who can beat Trump
fairly, but at the end of the day it's the DNC that ultimately decides the candidate and it won't be her.
Of course he's a liability to the Republicans, he's costing the intertwined criminal cabal from both parties money but I don't think the world is ready for Mick and his magic underwear.
Trump not standing in 2020? Only if he loses the support of his base. I do think there's one proposed bill re immigration that would seriously damage him but it's not being discussed yet. Maybe Fox will use this but let's face it, he's been great for MSM ratings on both sides.