'The question is then, what do you call, for example, a person of colour in a white supremacist country, such as the USA, who believes their race is equal to another race?'
FTFY
The cheek!
What would Adolf or John Vorster or Putin or Benyamin say?
PC Knee Jerk Madness
This post reminds me of a certain expat who spent a more than a decade on a crusade, trying to drive all white-skinned sex pests and predators out of the ESL teachers' rooms.leftistmadman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 1:13 pm'The question is then, what do you call, for example, a person of colour in a white supremacist country, such as the USA, who believes their race is equal to another race?'
FTFY
The cheek!
What would Adolf or John Vorster or Putin or Benyamin say?
It turned out that he was trying to eliminate the competition.
1
1
FTFY
You raise an interesting question and I am glad to see you acknowledge that the USA is a white supremacist country. Although I question your sincerity as you have promoted white supremacy and made many mean, racist, and Sinophobic posts in the past.fapsara wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:21 amSo the meaning of a racist has changed from someone who believes one race is superior to another and who may show or feel discrimination and/or prejudice against people of other races to the one above.
The question is then, what do you call, for example, a person of colour in a white supremacist country, such as the USA, who believes their race is superior to another race?
The meaning of words evolve all the time in English. For example, the word 'nice' used to mean something like 'foolish', but now it means something like 'delightful'. However, we do have words such as 'foolish' to describe people who would have called 'nice' in the 1200s.
Anyways, most experts would probably use words like "prejudiced" or "bigoted" to describe a person of colour who believes their race is superior to other races. In most cases, a person of colour who has bigoted views is suffering from internalized whiteness and their hateful actions are thus an enactment of whiteness. Life for many people of colour is hell in white supremacist countries like the UK, US, and Belgium and because many people of colour in these countries are traumatized and quite literally struggling to stay alive day to day, some of them end up embracing the views of their oppressors as some kind twisted coping mechanism.
Wait, you’re saying the problem with racist people of color is that they’re white on the inside? Please explain this one to me.
RIP Women
The words 'woman' and 'women', modern-day English forms of the Old English words wimman and wimmen, which are first attested in the 8th century C.E, have been cancelled.
Also, individuals over the age of 50 with non-vaginas are advised to have regular prostate exams.
The words 'woman' and 'women', modern-day English forms of the Old English words wimman and wimmen, which are first attested in the 8th century C.E, have been cancelled.
Also, individuals over the age of 50 with non-vaginas are advised to have regular prostate exams.
Robin DiAngelo, one of America's leading experts in the field of whiteness studies, has this to say in her bestselling book White Fragility:fapsara wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:21 amSo the meaning of a racist has changed from someone who believes one race is superior to another and who may show or feel discrimination and/or prejudice against people of other races to the one above.
The question is then, what do you call, for example, a person of colour in a white supremacist country, such as the USA, who believes their race is superior to another race?
The meaning of words evolve all the time in English. For example, the word 'nice' used to mean something like 'foolish', but now it means something like 'delightful'. However, we do have words such as 'foolish' to describe people who would have called 'nice' in the 1200s.
"People of color may also hold prejudices and discriminate against white people, but they lack the social and institutional power that transforms their prejudice and discrimination into racism; the impact of their prejudice on whites is temporary and contextual."
American politician calls for the teaching of history to be abolished .
It's a great idea. You can never be too ignorant.
1
1
- sounds_never_seen
- I live above an internet cafe
- Reactions: 5
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 12:56 pm
He's calling for a temporary abolishment and updated textbooks. Quite a difference.