US Election 2020
And now, Trumpie got a sledgehammer hit from his "own" Supreme Court, in a unanimous voting, it decided not to interfere in the US election process.
I'm legitimately confused by this. If the fraud was "so blatant" why have they specifically not alleged fraud in many of the cases they have made and also lost all but one case? Surely if the evidence is so blatant they would be doing better. Or is this just a case of Trump having an incompetent legal team? The judiciaries themselves often seem to have a GOP balance so surely it can't be a case of bias in the courts.convoluted wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 7:26 am
But this Democrat 'victory was so blatant in its fraud that it defies belief that anyone would not acknowledge that the election was stolen from Trump.
So Giuliani is creepy but that pales in comparison with the Democratic line up? That's fascinating. I'd throw at you a line up of Jim Jordan, McConnell, Gaetz, Sydney Powell, Cruz and Graham? Do you honestly think that this lot are much better? I do applaud you for not including AOC in your lineup as that would be too much of a cliche. Eh?convoluted wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 4:05 amNo I don't watch Rudy.
I think he's creepy. Quite a few Republicans are like that, but they pale compared to the horrific Democrat lineup of Maxine Waters, Nancy Pelosi, Schiff, Schumer. Swawell, the Squad and on and on.
Lots of Americans and lots of we outsiders would love to see a new third party US option. And tens of millions of Americans would want it modelled on what Trump provided to ordinary Americans during his 4 years,
What is compelling re. the claims of electoral fraud is the number of ordinary concerned common folk, some Democrat, some Independent, who have come forward with affidavits detailing the corruption and obstruction that they witnessed.
By going public, these whistleblowers are knowingly exposing themselves to the full force of the vitriolic hatred that characterizes today's Democrat Party.
They know they will be abused and threatened, that they will have reduced job opportunities or advancement opportunities, that they will be vilified till the end of time.
But still they have come forward, and so many of their accounts tie in.
Contrast that with the fact that the Democrats concocted an impeachment of Trump based entirely on an ANONYMOUS whistleblower who 'reported' a legitimate phone conversation as being somehow dodgy. And every MSN news anchor and commentator and every ranking Democrat figure of the time described this person as a courageous patriot for coming forward.
Glorified as 'courageous', though never self-identifying and so perhaps even non-existent, yet that same MSN cohort and Democrats pour scorn and contempt on those very real persons whistleblowing about the electoral fraud.
My question back to you VOX 11 is do you seriously not see anything amiss with mail in ballots requiring neither ID or signature verification when ID is required to purchase liquor?
What exactly did Trump provide to "ordinary Americans"? I also find this fascinating. If you were a rich white American you did pretty well but I'm not sure how things played out for "ordinary Americans". What is an "ordinary American" also? 81 million Americans didn't vote for Trump. Are they to be considered "peculiar Americans" I wonder?
Now we have "ordinary concerned commonfolk" and their affadavits? Is this the fifteenth century now? Regardless, a common refrain has been "show me the evidence" of widespread fraud that would actually change the election results. In all elections there are some examples of fraud but there is nothing that suggests such things happen in this election. I'm talking "widespread", I'm not talking individual examples.
Your impeachment stuff just sort of melted into a rant about MSN so I'm going to leave that there.
As for mail in ballots. A familiar refrain. But I am also confused... If mail in ballots are so bad then why did Trump encourage them in Florida but not in other states?
- Lucky Lucan
- K440 Knight Captain
- Reactions: 761
- Posts: 22525
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:24 pm
- Location: The Pearl of the Orient
Sure, that explains why so many of Trumps team were indicted and jailed. You are one seriously deluded individual.convoluted wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 7:26 amThe claim of Russian influence backing Trump was based on absolutely nothing, as the ultimately embarrassing 'Mueller investigation" exposed itself in the most humiliating manner possible with a flustered and clueless Mueller flailing helplessly in the televised conclusion.
https://www.businessinsider.com/who-has ... chairman-3
Romantic Cambodia is dead and gone. It's with McKinley in the grave.
The whole is not about reality, though by continuous repeat influencing the public opinion.Vox II wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 9:10 amI'm legitimately confused by this. If the fraud was "so blatant" why have they specifically not alleged fraud in many of the cases they have made and also lost all but one case? Surely if the evidence is so blatant they would be doing better. Or is this just a case of Trump having an incompetent legal team? The judiciaries themselves often seem to have a GOP balance so surely it can't be a case of bias in the courts.convoluted wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 7:26 am
But this Democrat 'victory was so blatant in its fraud that it defies belief that anyone would not acknowledge that the election was stolen from Trump.
And that public opinion creates the seed for Trumpie his fraudulent pension fund, AKA, the scam for "Official Election Defense Fund" and the "Republican National Committee" getting the first USD 8333 of each donation and only the rest goes to the "recount fund". Or so to say, Trump is now funding his activities for the upcoming years (be it 2024 run for president or just playing golf, he got the money and the authority to decide where to spend it).
1
1
Not in disagreement with this necessarily but eager to understand what Convoluted and Visser think. Do they just think that the system is completely broken and thats why some GOP (in Georgia) and the Supreme Court and indeed Courts are standing up to Trump? Do they truly believe that Trump's behaviour post election is actually to be applauded?v12 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 9:24 amThe whole is not about reality, though by continuous repeat influencing the public opinion.Vox II wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 9:10 amI'm legitimately confused by this. If the fraud was "so blatant" why have they specifically not alleged fraud in many of the cases they have made and also lost all but one case? Surely if the evidence is so blatant they would be doing better. Or is this just a case of Trump having an incompetent legal team? The judiciaries themselves often seem to have a GOP balance so surely it can't be a case of bias in the courts.convoluted wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 7:26 am
But this Democrat 'victory was so blatant in its fraud that it defies belief that anyone would not acknowledge that the election was stolen from Trump.
And that public opinion creates the seed for Trumpie his fraudulent pension fund, AKA, the scam for "Official Election Defense Fund" and the "Republican National Committee" getting the first USD 8333 of each donation and only the rest goes to the "recount fund". Or so to say, Trump is now funding his activities for the upcoming years (be it 2024 run for president or just playing golf, he got the money and the authority to decide where to spend it).
- chkai chgout
- I live above an internet cafe
- Reactions: 57
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2019 6:46 am
- Lucky Lucan
- K440 Knight Captain
- Reactions: 761
- Posts: 22525
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:24 pm
- Location: The Pearl of the Orient
What a pathetic response. You have no idea what is going on because you only believe BS far right propaganda and lies. Good luck with the window licking.Visser wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 11:20 amYes, dozens of people in the Trump team were sent to jail over this.Lucky Lucan wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 9:22 amSure, that explains why so many of Trumps team were indicted and jailed. You are one seriously deluded individual.convoluted wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 7:26 amThe claim of Russian influence backing Trump was based on absolutely nothing, as the ultimately embarrassing 'Mueller investigation" exposed itself in the most humiliating manner possible with a flustered and clueless Mueller flailing helplessly in the televised conclusion.
https://www.businessinsider.com/who-has ... chairman-3
You really have no idea what you are talking about, yet you call others deluded?
*inserts muppet smilie*
Romantic Cambodia is dead and gone. It's with McKinley in the grave.
- Lucky Lucan
- K440 Knight Captain
- Reactions: 761
- Posts: 22525
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:24 pm
- Location: The Pearl of the Orient
What a bunch of whataboutism and nonsense. You cult members are really something.Visser wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 11:59 amTell that to all the people who's children got murdered by Obama's illegal drown strikes.
Or all the people who died by the hands of the Mexican cartels with the weapons Obama sold them,
Or the people of Syria who died by the hands of US trained jihadists in an illegal war.
The guy spied on the campaign of a political opponent, Nixon got axed for that.
Did I mention the black Africans who are now being sold as slaves in Libya on a daily basis?
Or the cages he built for the Mexican children that crossed the border?
Yes we can!
2
1
1
Romantic Cambodia is dead and gone. It's with McKinley in the grave.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 11 Replies
- 10913 Views
-
Last post by violet
Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:18 am
-
- 27 Replies
- 13631 Views
-
Last post by ricecakes
Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:39 am
-
- 22 Replies
- 16328 Views
-
Last post by motor cy
Wed Oct 28, 2020 6:48 am
-
- 14 Replies
- 14534 Views
-
Last post by Alexandra
Fri Jul 24, 2020 11:31 am
-
- 6 Replies
- 4551 Views
-
Last post by Hairy-nosed Otter
Wed Oct 28, 2020 7:45 pm