Australia’s SOS - Christine Anderson - from the EU Parliament.
-
- 5 minutes to kill
- Reactions: 3
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2020 11:55 am
Australia’s SOS - Christine Anderson - from the EU Parliament.
Christine Anderson speaks out on Australia’s behalf. She says she will do whatever she can to stop the tyranny.
Their freedumb to infect others by selfishly refusing the vaccine.
She looks far too old to be of the "Dreamers" generation.
What an utter nonsense.
Australia does have quite some totalitarian characteristics, she would be correct about that.
YT should kill that channel, because of misinformation.
What an utter nonsense.
Australia does have quite some totalitarian characteristics, she would be correct about that.
YT should kill that channel, because of misinformation.
YouTube and Google should not be censoring any political content even if it contains misinformation. If they do then the law should treat them like a publisher and not a platform as they are curating information. Corporations should not be able to control the flow of information.
1
1
-
- Permanently Banned
- Reactions: 94
- Posts: 1970
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 10:42 am
Under 30s have a minuscule risk of complications with covid. Why the fuck are governments wanting to vaccinate everyone it makes no sense.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 11:04 amTheir freedumb to infect others by selfishly refusing the vaccine.
The risk from the vaccine far outweighs the risk of catching covid for most younger people.
Many of the vaccinated are selfish and want to put children's lives at risk for the sake of their health. Vaccine side effects are much more dangerous than covid for young people. Over 18000 vaccine deaths you stupid guest.
They are cutting corners at people's expense. I can't believe the sheep who took their children to get vaccinated.
There is a big difference in misinformation and information.Harold wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 8:35 pmYouTube and Google should not be censoring any political content even if it contains misinformation. If they do then the law should treat them like a publisher and not a platform as they are curating information. Corporations should not be able to control the flow of information.
What the Australian lady is proclaiming does qualify for misinformation, the same type Trumpie utters around his election loss.
Fakebook has been caught out now on deliberately violating that principle. Google tends to be slow to react. And Twatter missed out completely and -now catching up- got swamped by fake right wing complainers. How naive, the way Twatter did implement their complain mechanisms: Honesty does not exist on the Internet, when pushing right wing lies is the goal.
Wrong, the younger generation does largely not get sick themselves (though long-Covid is highly relevant for this age group), though the younger generation operates as superspreaders towards other age groups. It has been reported that the majority of the current EU infections are 6-18 years and their parents.Fred Edwards wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 10:58 pmUnder 30s have a minuscule risk of complications with covid. Why the fuck are governments wanting to vaccinate everyone it makes no sense.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 11:04 amTheir freedumb to infect others by selfishly refusing the vaccine.
The risk from the vaccine far outweighs the risk of catching covid for most younger people.
Yeah, sure, another conspiracy theory, not supported by any scientific knowledge.Fred Edwards wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 10:58 pmMany of the vaccinated are selfish and want to put children's lives at risk for the sake of their health. Vaccine side effects are much more dangerous than covid for young people. Over 18000 vaccine deaths you stupid guest.
They are cutting corners at people's expense. I can't believe the sheep who took their children to get vaccinated.
SCIENCE SHOWS, without a sufficiently high vaccination level, across the board, there will be no option to open up a country and social activities, without things getting completely out of control. SCIENCE, not Fred on FakeBook.
The same with China, the country can not depart from its Zero-Covid strategy. China scientists calculated, this would result into some 600+K infections a day, see:
China extols isolation as countries rush to impose Omicron travel bans
So, back into your own sheep cage, don't get out, before Covid-19 disappears. Too much nonsense. Don't read Fakebook, Twatter and all those right wing conspiracy websites.
FakeBook sued for $150B over AI fueled violence against Rohingya
This is why we need Tech companies being responsible for large scale automated spreading of misinformation.
This is why we need Tech companies being responsible for large scale automated spreading of misinformation.
- Hot_Pink_Urinal_Mint
- I need professional help
- Reactions: 74
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 3:19 pm
- Location: Right behind you
No, Science doesn't show anything. Science is a method.
What you are referring to scientism. What evidence would you need to convince yourself that the "injections"" are dangerous for some people. If the answer is none, that's scientism.
Did you even listen to the woman? She's talking about the steady, systematic removal of human rights by our governments and technocrats -without any debate.
Is this reflective of an open, democratic society? That is the question!
-
- I live above an internet cafe
- Reactions: 31
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:22 am
So enforcing vaccination to keep infection levels down for society at large is totalitarian and inhumane, whilst the same governments deciding on what side of the road you can drive or if you can rob banks just for fun is ok? Come on every society has rules to make interactions smooth. Vaccination is not threatening your liberty. It’s part of a contract defining how a society can live together.
1
1
Nitpicking about an exact word, where you yourself are wrong (Science is not a method, it's an abstract concept) ? Great.Hot_Pink_Urinal_Mint wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 7:29 amNo, Science doesn't show anything. Science is a method.
What you are referring to scientism. What evidence would you need to convince yourself that the "injections"" are dangerous for some people. If the answer is none, that's scientism.
Did you even listen to the woman? She's talking about the steady, systematic removal of human rights by our governments and technocrats -without any debate.
Is this reflective of an open, democratic society? That is the question!
The first order benefits of vaccinations are several magnitudes higher than the extreme marginal n-th order risk.
Wearing seatbelts, all driving on the same side of the road, and a huge amount of other agreements (largely laid out in laws) are also freedom limiting, though are all intended for the benefit of the whole community.
The same for vaccinations. It's for the benefit of the entire community, and as such also for each and every person being vaccinated. Be it, that the vaccinated person has a very significant lower chance to get ill, let alone die, as well that the public health based social limitations can be reduced.
So, by accepting a very small reduction of ones' freedom, the overall freedom will be significantly bigger, for all and everybody.
Though, to understand that concept, you need to have some brains, and not read all that disinformation conspiracies garbage.
Is this democracy: Yep, the majority decides to which you have to comply. So, also for vaccinations. Easy, not that difficult.
Unfortunately, too many people are influenced by disinformation/conspiracies, and it takes a long time to let them wake up. All that wasted time, society will be in some form of lockdown and people are experiencing less freedom than would be possible, when people would understand faster what is wise to do. And that includes people with strange handles on a forum, targeted to Western non-natives in Cambodia.
And, because the vaccine mandates are based on democratic decisions, that woman is just speaking garbage, an attention seeker. FakeBook level of intelligence.
Tell that to 6 million Jews.....Is this democracy: Yep, the majority decides to which you have to comply. So, also for vaccinations. Easy, not that difficult.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
SLP featuring Ian Delta Anderson @ Oscars 16th November, 10pm
by tobymalone » Tue Nov 05, 2019 4:28 pm » in Upcoming Events and Announcements - 0 Replies
- 2840 Views
-
Last post by tobymalone
Tue Nov 05, 2019 4:28 pm
-
-
- 3 Replies
- 908 Views
-
Last post by Hanno
Fri Aug 13, 2021 7:25 am
-
- 4 Replies
- 571 Views
-
Last post by Sid Singer
Sun Jul 02, 2023 10:17 am
-
- 6 Replies
- 792 Views
-
Last post by scoffer
Fri Jun 23, 2023 3:11 pm
-
-
Australia partner visa subclass 801
by didgeydoo » Sun Jan 15, 2023 1:59 pm » in Family, children and relationships - 7 Replies
- 1227 Views
-
Last post by didgeydoo
Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:46 pm
-