US Election 2020
On a separate note it is now more clear why he is not conceding.
The Trump campaign is asking for more donations to Fight Electoral Fraud. In the small print of the email is the declaration that 50 percent of the contribution will be used to retire the debt run up by the Trump campaign so far.
Why let election defeat get in the way of one last opportunity to milk the gullible base for more cash?
The Trump campaign is asking for more donations to Fight Electoral Fraud. In the small print of the email is the declaration that 50 percent of the contribution will be used to retire the debt run up by the Trump campaign so far.
Why let election defeat get in the way of one last opportunity to milk the gullible base for more cash?
1
1
You have to hand it to the man, motivating people to vote long after thy are dead is no small featangsta wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 11:31 amHe lost because he managed to motivate millions of people who would never usually vote, to register and vote against him because he is such a grade-A cunt. Keep crying into your Breitbart videos like they are based on facts. Steve Bannon is going to jail.
Current legal challenges against the election are running at 0-10 because YouTube algorithms aren't real life.
Keep crying. Your boy lost.
https://in.reuters.com/article/us-usa-e ... SKBN27N0SS
LOL
None but ourselves can free our mind.
Once again, Visser - who i consider an intelligent fella - displays either complete gullibility or a wilful inclination to perpetuate this nonsense.
There is no evidence that dead people voted and the claim is being widely rejected as absolute nonsense.
I prefer to think that Visser actually knows this and is just trolling. It would be horrible to think he is this incredulous really.
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/08/tech ... index.html
There is no evidence that dead people voted and the claim is being widely rejected as absolute nonsense.
I prefer to think that Visser actually knows this and is just trolling. It would be horrible to think he is this incredulous really.
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/08/tech ... index.html
1
1
Last edited by scobienz on Mon Nov 09, 2020 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- I Love 440 More Than Real Life
- Reactions: 12
- Posts: 2760
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:12 am
- Location: entering the void
It will probably work. They aren't the sharpest tools in the shed.scobienz wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 2:33 pmOn a separate note it is now more clear why he is not conceding.
The Trump campaign is asking for more donations to Fight Electoral Fraud. In the small print of the email is the declaration that 50 percent of the contribution will be used to retire the debt run up by the Trump campaign so far.
Why let election defeat get in the way of one last opportunity to milk the gullible base for more cash?
I think you're projecting, you are smarter then just blindly believing the orange man bad network when it comes to any news regarding the president.scobienz wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 4:40 pmOnce again, Visser - who i consider an intelligent fella - displays either complete gullibility or a wilful inclination to perpetuate this nonsense.
There is no evidence that dead people voted and the claim is being widely rejected as absolute nonsense.
I prefer to think that Visser actually knows this and is just trolling. It would be horrible to think he is this incredulous really.
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/08/tech ... index.html
But nice word play, I'd say there is a 0% chance that dead people voted.
The question is who requested those ballots and returned them?
None but ourselves can free our mind.
Visser wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 5:18 pmI think you're projecting, you are smarter then just blindly believing the orange man bad network when it comes to any news regarding the president.scobienz wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 4:40 pmOnce again, Visser - who i consider an intelligent fella - displays either complete gullibility or a wilful inclination to perpetuate this nonsense.
There is no evidence that dead people voted and the claim is being widely rejected as absolute nonsense.
I prefer to think that Visser actually knows this and is just trolling. It would be horrible to think he is this incredulous really.
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/08/tech ... index.html
But nice word play, I'd say there is a 0% chance that dead people voted.
The question is who requested those ballots and returned them?
They weren’t returned Visser. That is just the point.
As the article said, Most of the random 50 people in the list are dead. They didn’t vote. As you would expect. Some did vote; but it was shown they aren’t in fact dead.
It’s not rocket science.
This is how lies start. Look at the story of the 114 year old Michigan man who Trumpists are saying voted. He didn’t. He died in 1984. BUT his son - with the same name and living in the same house as his deceased father - is alive and did vote.
Stop this nonsense fella. It makes you look desperate.
You chide me for believing CNN. It's not just CNN saying this. It is republican leaders in places like Georgia, and Pennsylvania. It is people like Bush. It is quite literally everyone outside of Trump's sycophantic inner circle and his hapless fans.
- Lucky Lucan
- K440 Knight Captain
- Reactions: 761
- Posts: 22525
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:24 pm
- Location: The Pearl of the Orient
Anyone who doesn't believe in the cult is automatically a CNN supporter. There are no other ways of looking at the world. You are either with Ted Turner or Rupert Murdoch, those are the only options. As an aside it looks like Murdoch isn't backing the loser anymore.
Romantic Cambodia is dead and gone. It's with McKinley in the grave.
You've shown me nothing that shows he has voted. You've sent me a random death notice, the front page of a voter information centre, and three copy and pasted dates which you say shows he voted. Similarly I have no idea of knowing that if a chap called Myers voted, whether he simply had the same name.
I've tried to google the story and see absolutely no sources about it, in either main stream media or your preferred disinformation sites.
I know you kool aid drinkers like to get your information from anonymous idiots on parler or breitbart or someting like that. The rest of the world prefers evidence. Real evidence.
Curiously, pesky nuisance institutions like courts require that too. YOu know . . the same courts have are quite literally throwing out Trump's case, often with derisive laughter.
Here's another guide to how good his evidence is. The first guy Guiliani had speak at his dildo shop press conference the other day turns out to have nothing to do with Philadelphia - instead he is a convicted child sex offender from New Jersey who has a history of trying to stand for election there, and being rejected.
https://www.politico.com/states/new-jer ... er-1335241
Who would have thought it?
1
1
This Visser is embarassing himself.
Reminds me increasingly of Jep.
Reminds me increasingly of Jep.
Visser may have heard it from this credible guy, one of Giuliani's and Trump's top blokesGuest wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 10:57 pmThis Visser is embarassing himself.
Reminds me increasingly of Jep.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... ender.html
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 11 Replies
- 11076 Views
-
Last post by violet
Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:18 am
-
- 27 Replies
- 13802 Views
-
Last post by ricecakes
Fri Aug 28, 2020 5:39 am
-
- 22 Replies
- 16509 Views
-
Last post by motor cy
Wed Oct 28, 2020 6:48 am
-
- 14 Replies
- 14724 Views
-
Last post by Alexandra
Fri Jul 24, 2020 11:31 am
-
- 6 Replies
- 4608 Views
-
Last post by Hairy-nosed Otter
Wed Oct 28, 2020 7:45 pm