Just Robbed wrote:On balance it sounds like she is some kind of crusading photographer capturing what she thinks are scenes of depravity. She needs to get out more.
Well, less. A lot less. Leave the rest of us in peace.
Post by andyinasia » Thu Feb 05, 2015 9:58 pm
Just Robbed wrote:On balance it sounds like she is some kind of crusading photographer capturing what she thinks are scenes of depravity. She needs to get out more.
Post by DetroitMuscle » Fri Feb 06, 2015 4:08 pm
Post by MekongMouse » Fri Feb 06, 2015 4:08 pm
Post by MekongMouse » Fri Feb 06, 2015 4:36 pm
The video DetroitMuscle posted was of Rick Astley, but is no longer in his post and there's no text at the bottom to indicate he deleted it, so it makes sense that a mod did it. No big deal, was mostly poking fun at the delete before view attitude it seems this mod took.Joon wrote:What are you talking about? No post in that thread has been modded, edited or deleted.MekongMouse wrote:It was worth it because I love that song.
Edit: So now rickrolling is banned?
Post by gavinmac » Fri Feb 06, 2015 4:40 pm
Joon just told you that no mod edited it. Also, the "edited by" text at the bottom only appears if the poster edits a post after someone else has posted. Prior to anyone else posting, you can edit a post as often as you like and there is no record of it.MekongMouse wrote: and there's no text at the bottom to indicate he deleted it, so it makes sense that a mod did it.
Post by LTO » Fri Feb 06, 2015 4:53 pm
If DM edited his post after you started writing your reponse but before you hit 'submit' it can look like it's still there while you are reponding but be gone without an 'edit' tag afterward.MekongMouse wrote:The video DetroitMuscle posted was of Rick Astley, but is no longer in his post and there's no text at the bottom to indicate he deleted it, so it makes sense that a mod did it. No big deal, was mostly poking fun at the delete before view attitude it seems this mod took.Joon wrote:What are you talking about? No post in that thread has been modded, edited or deleted.MekongMouse wrote:It was worth it because I love that song.
Edit: So now rickrolling is banned?
Post by LTO » Tue Mar 10, 2015 3:27 pm
I think he's wrong about the whole espionage thing, but I find it interesting he has chosen to post about it at this time. Has he been reading 440/CEO, or heard the stories himself, or perhaps, being connected to the child-assistance NGO, does he know something more?Don’t take illegal pictures of people
Taking photos of people on public areas without their consent, can be considered espionage.
If you come to Cambodia to take pictures of other foreigners to support campaigns such as the persecution of sexual offenders, you must know that it is considered espionage and thus it is a crime. Working in any organization to prevent or to persecute offenders, does not entitle you to take photos of persons without their consent. A good mission or a great ideal such as protecting children, does not give you the right to commit another crime that could be also abusive like defaming the name of a person that could be mostly innocent. Taking an illegal picture of a man would make him a suspect of a possible undergoing crime...
...Going around with a camera to persecute possible sexual offenders is not a good idea, because you will break other laws such as the right of privacy and the right to a good name. If you take photos of a man in a public area just because he is near minors, that person can accuse you of defamation. That person can call the authorities and you could be arrested under espionage charges, involving also your own organization, if you are working for one. Persons around can find you also disturbing, such as disturbing customers and they could take violent actions against you.
https://cambodia1.wordpress.com/2015/03 ... of-people/
Post by Phuket2006 » Tue Mar 10, 2015 4:21 pm
Post by Felgerkarb » Tue Mar 10, 2015 4:35 pm
Post by LTO » Tue Mar 10, 2015 4:55 pm
Don't know if that's true, but it does kind of have that feel. Hopefully somebody will catch one of these women soon, find out what's up.rgrowden wrote:It would appear some organization is compiling a database. Facial recognition technology is so good today, if your picture lands in a government database, you're identifiable.